Jump to content

Catchers Interference!

Thunderheads

By Thunderheads
in Professional

 Share
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3969 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Cav
Cav

UIC: That's interference! F2: What? UIC: Your glove hit his bat on the swing. F2:  I didn't hit his bat; his bat hit my glove! UIC: Exactly. F2: What?

maven
maven

​Point to F2, "That's interference!" After play has ceased, "Time! That's interference! You (to R3) score, you 3B, you 2B, you 1B." Just like that.

scrounge
scrounge

b-b-b-but I didn't *mean* to!!!

maven

maven

Posted
Posted

What was inappropriate about Baker's call, Maven?

​From my standpoint, nothing at all.

F2 was working him: I was imagining how that went.

UmpJeff

UmpJeff

Posted
Posted

​From my standpoint, nothing at all.

F2 was working him: I was imagining how that went.

​Gotcha!  I concur...

Cav

Cav

Posted
Posted

UIC: That's interference!

F2: What?

UIC: Your glove hit his bat on the swing.

F2:  I didn't hit his bat; his bat hit my glove!

UIC: Exactly.

F2: What?

  • Like 2
jpperez14

jpperez14

Posted
Posted

UIC: That's interference!

F2: What?

UIC: Your glove hit his bat on the swing.

F2:  I didn't hit his bat; his bat hit my glove!

UIC: Exactly.

F2: What?

Blue blue it was a foul ball tho!!!!

UmpJeff

UmpJeff

Posted
Posted

Blue blue it was a foul ball tho!!!!

​...or was it a foul tip???

Mudder

Mudder

Posted
Posted

Lately I been having trouble distinguishing between catcher's interference and a foul tip.  The OP was obvious, but those really close ones where the batter swings and the catcher's glove is very close to the ball, F2 catches the ball and you hear 2 sounds, but you can't tell if its bat on ball, then ball in mitt..... or bat on mitt, then ball in mitt

 Anyone else have this problem?

Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Lately I been having trouble distinguishing between catcher's interference and a foul tip.  The OP was obvious, but those really close ones where the batter swings and the catcher's glove is very close to the ball, F2 catches the ball and you hear 2 sounds, but you can't tell if its bat on ball, then ball in mitt..... or bat on mitt, then ball in mitt

 Anyone else have this problem?

​no ...

typically the ball isn't caught on CI .... right?

 

jpperez14

jpperez14

Posted
Posted

​no ...

typically the ball isn't caught on CI .... right?

 

 

Typically on catchers interference, the catcher will give a reaction whether it be he moves his gloves towards his body, or he'll be holding his hurt hand, and/or the glove will come off the catchers hand. I have not personally seen a catcher catch the ball on CI. 

  • Like 1
kylehutson

kylehutson

Posted
Posted

​...or was it a foul tip???

​Only if you're posting headlines for mlb.com

  • Like 1
grayhawk

grayhawk

Posted
Posted

Lately I been having trouble distinguishing between catcher's interference and a foul tip.  The OP was obvious, but those really close ones where the batter swings and the catcher's glove is very close to the ball, F2 catches the ball and you hear 2 sounds, but you can't tell if its bat on ball, then ball in mitt..... or bat on mitt, then ball in mitt

 Anyone else have this problem?

​I'm sure we've all heard 2 sounds in this situation and not known 100% if the bat hit the ball or the mitt.  If you aren't sure, then slow down and use the players' reactions to help guide you.  Most of the time, the bat hit the ball and not the mitt and nobody says a word.  Don't rock the boat unless you're 100% sure.

  • Like 1
Mudder

Mudder

Posted
Posted

​I'm sure we've all heard 2 sounds in this situation and not known 100% if the bat hit the ball or the mitt.  If you aren't sure, then slow down and use the players' reactions to help guide you.  Most of the time, the bat hit the ball and not the mitt and nobody says a word.  Don't rock the boat unless you're 100% sure.

Don't like too, but relying on the players' reactions is what I've been doing, especially the batter, as I find this is something they won't usually sell if it did not happen.  I know CI does not usually result in F2 catching the ball, but if I'm really unsure, after the pitch I will step out from behind the plate slowly in the opposite batter's box, if both are just preparing for the next pitch not looking at me, I ignore

UMP45

UMP45

Posted
Posted

What was inappropriate about Baker's call, Maven?

​Maven was channeling the Hawk!

Replacematt

Replacematt

Posted
Posted

​I'm sure we've all heard 2 sounds in this situation and not known 100% if the bat hit the ball or the mitt.  If you aren't sure, then slow down and use the players' reactions to help guide you.  Most of the time, the bat hit the ball and not the mitt and nobody says a word.  Don't rock the boat unless you're 100% sure.

​What would be the second sound?

grayhawk

grayhawk

Posted
Posted

​What would be the second sound?

​The ball glancing off the catcher's mitt.  Those are the times it's difficult to tell which happened first.  Bat hitting ball, then ball hitting mitt?  Or bat hitting mitt, then bat hitting ball?

ricka56

ricka56

Posted
Posted

I'm tracking the pitch...I am not good enough to actually see CI. If I hear the 2 sounds and the ball has gone straight back, I assume no CI (ball hit mitt). If I hear the 2 sounds and the ball has gone elsewhere, I assume CI.

And as always, I assume the risks of assuming.

JaxRolo

JaxRolo

Posted
Posted

How can you call that at a time like this with bases loaded?????

maven

maven

Posted
Posted

How can you call that at a time like this with bases loaded?????

​Point to F2, "That's interference!"

After play has ceased, "Time! That's interference! You (to R3) score, you 3B, you 2B, you 1B."

Just like that. ;)

  • Like 2
Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
  • Author
Posted

​Point to F2, "That's interference!"

After play has ceased, "Time! That's interference! You (to R3) score, you 3B, you 2B, you 1B."

Just like that. ;)

​he's kidding @maven .......I think he forgot a smiley.....

johnnyg08

johnnyg08

Posted
Posted

​The ball glancing off the catcher's mitt.  Those are the times it's difficult to tell which happened first.  Bat hitting ball, then ball hitting mitt?  Or bat hitting mitt, then bat hitting ball?

​I agree with this.  These are very tough.  The ones where the glove doesn't come off are the hardest to get.  This is a harder call on the less obvious ones.  We are looking through the catcher, the batter, the bat, ball, and mitt.  This really is an excellent call.  

 

  • 2 weeks later...
JDavis225

JDavis225

Posted
Posted

IDK about you guys but I LOVE the awarding of the bases. He put an emphasis on it that you rarely see in MLB because the players somehow are expected to know their awards. He didn't award the middle guys (I guess they can figure it out). 

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...