Jump to content

ricka56

Established Member
  • Content Count

    2,874
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    35

ricka56 last won the day on August 24 2018

ricka56 had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

1,141 Excellent

About ricka56

  • Rank
    what ? me worry ?
  • Birthday 04/01/2001

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Bearded Clam, MA

Recent Profile Visitors

9,660 profile views
  1. ricka56

    HS hurdling rule

    3-3-1n. initiate malicious contact on offense or defense; In (n), ... if on offense, the player is ejected and declared out, unless he has already scored. It is always hazardous to port one rule to cover an unrelated play. That said, I'd agree, but not admit that I used the MC exception. In the OP side note, it says that R3 did a much safer thing, diving over F2, rather than collide full speed with F2. You have to give R3 consideration for avoiding the contact/collision...doesn't merit a stiffer penalty. Of course, that consideration is moot if there is an actual rule to apply. But in this case, none seem to apply.
  2. There is an old humorous umpire saying that has no real validity, but might be apt here. If you need a strike, call a strike. If you need an out, call an out. If you need a run, balk it in.
  3. ricka56

    Obstruction

    The runner can not be sent home without jeopardy of being tagged out at home. The umpire might think that the runner's progress was impeded by a step or two. If he is thrown out at HP by 5 steps or more, then the out stands. And there is no returning him to 3B in that scenario. Few coaches don't understand why their obstructed runner can be called out (or act like they don't). It will take all of the umpire(s) game management skills to survive this call. Most likely, though, the game becomes a $#!+show henceforward.
  4. I'm trying to simplify this rule addition. Do I have the above correct: If this is correct, then this shouldn't be much of a brain teaser
  5. I can picture it. So few kids really get baseball. Unless they watch MLB games on TV, there is no way a part time coach can teach the game in two, one hour per week practices.
  6. You are asking a player to do something other than what he would normally be doing and that's inviting trouble. If he turns his wrist to show you the ball and it falls out of his glove, then you have created a problem. Did he have secure possession of the ball (catch/no-catch) ? You'd may give the fielder the benefit of the doubt since it was your request to see the ball that initiated the drop, but it is a debate that you unnecessarily created.
  7. ricka56

    What's The Call?

    I cite the words in my signature line when I say that any batter "unaware" to the degree that they could not avoid being struck by their own high pop-up deserves to be called out. Fortunately, there is also rule support for not rewarding the dumb$#!+.
  8. ricka56

    What's The Call?

    78 post on a "Ask the umpire" thread...make that 79. There had to be a train wreck in here somewhere...I had to look. I'm going with what I think would be easiest to sell, an out. Not out takes too much rules gymnastics (over-officating).
  9. Coach: You make that call when we're getting our asses handed to us like this ? Umpire: Sorry about that coach ? Coach: What ? So you're sorry that you made that call ? Umpire: No no, skip, I'm empathizing. My therapist said that I should empathize more and be sarcastic less.
  10. ricka56

    “45 degree rule”

    1. For a LHP to throw to 1B, he has to turn/cock his left shoulder to make that throw ... and his foot is within the mythical 45 degrees. Some lefties are better than others at delaying their commitment to HP or 1B . But you can tell by his left shoulder if he's throwing to 1B. I don't touch this move. 2. When LHP intends to deliver a pitch at time-of-pitch (TOP), but then decides late to throw to 1B (often instigated by R1 breaking on first movement), F1 may balk. To be able to make that throw (without falling on his arse), his non-pivot foot clearly steps more toward HP than 1B. I hope to be all over those. That's all I can do with my limited umpire skills. And OHC can pound sand when LHP does (1).
  11. So, 235 got the it right....Good call
  12. I find it amusing that a left coast umpire had no RLI in real time and this right coast umpire had RLI in real time. Not throwing shade ...just noting amusement. Though I'd have been less amused had the 4-0 Dodgers score held up. ...too soon ?
  13. The Red Sox came back and made this play a moot point for baseball fans. But if the 4-0 Dodgers score had held up, this play would have become as big as any controversial WS umpire call. Maybe it was Alex Cora's inexperience, but he should have insisted that the crew get together and piece that play back together (like in the old-old days before IR reviews). Joe Madden would have insisted on that. It is a one of the unintended consequences of relying on technology that would have been fun to watch play out. ...though, I would have hated to see the villianization of the PU that would have accompanied it.
  14. That play wasn't eligible for replay review, but it was eligible for an on-field crew review. They might have been able to piece this play back together and save PU who was as busy as a one-legged man in an ass kicking contest on that batted ball.
×
×
  • Create New...