Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4376 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yes, the runner is inside, so he's liable for an INT call.  There still needs to be INT, though --it's not automatic.  And, like scrounge, I can't tell if that's what happened or not.

Posted

Agreed: he's inside, so liable.

 

I think the ball hit him as he reached the base: no hindrance = no INT.

 

In any case, it's awfully tight. Either call is probably supportable. Here's the ball about to hit the runner.

 

Screen_Shot_2014_08_04_at_9_49_31_AM.png

Posted

I have interference.  BR running inside the entire way and hit with the throw prior to reaching first which prevented F3 from catching the throw.

Posted

wow.. you guys need to get a grip on RLi... this is RLI all the way everyday all day....

 

look rule. 6.05k... the BR ran the entire way in fair territory, he is only allowed to exit the lane to touch the base in the last slide, step, or reach of the base..

 

Now you must also have a quality throw, ( which there was)...

  • Like 1
Posted

wow.. you guys need to get a grip on RLi... this is RLI all the way everyday all day....<br /><br />look rule. 6.05k... the BR ran the entire way in fair territory, he is only allowed to exit the lane to touch the base in the last slide, step, or reach of the base..<br /><br />Now you must also have a quality throw, ( which there was)...

<br />Thank you sir for the fresh response of sensibility! :-)
Posted

RLI is one of the hardest for guys to call... umpires get scared, your going to call someone out, and possibly move a runner back, take off a run.. something... so it is very tough for a lot of guys to call.

Posted

RLI is one of the hardest for guys to call... umpires get scared, your going to call someone out, and possibly move a runner back, take off a run.. something... so it is very tough for a lot of guys to call.

Not for me. I like paperwork. I don't find it coincidental that every game in the past three years I've had an EJ as PU, I've had RLI against the ejectee's team earlier in the game.

Posted

My ejection rate is 50% on RLI calls.  For every 2 RLI calls I make, 1 will end in an ejection. 

 

So be it.  I won't shirk my responsibility. 

 

As for the OP, looks like they missed this one.

Posted

Everyone but the MLB guys have INT on this.  Ironic?

No, it's not at all.

Again ....we've seen this exact play numerous times this year, every time it's been called

Posted

 

Everyone but the MLB guys have INT on this.  Ironic?

No, it's not at all.

Again ....we've seen this exact play numerous times this year, every time it's been called

 

Why not this time?

Posted

 

 

Everyone but the MLB guys have INT on this.  Ironic?

No, it's not at all.

Again ....we've seen this exact play numerous times this year, every time it's been called

 

Why not this time?

 

It either was missed, or just wasn't seen .......... it happens

Posted

 

 

 

Everyone but the MLB guys have INT on this.  Ironic?

No, it's not at all.

Again ....we've seen this exact play numerous times this year, every time it's been called

 

Why not this time?

 

It either was missed, or just wasn't seen .......... it happens

 

All the time. Some of us more than others! :smachhead:

×
×
  • Create New...