- 0
Foul Ball Conundrum
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3691 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.
-
Similar Content
-
- 3 replies
- 1,402 views
-
- 22 replies
- 3,863 views
-
- 13 replies
- 2,987 views
-
- 12 replies
- 3,322 views
-
- 2 replies
- 1,471 views
-

Question
Mad Mike
I need some input on a FED issue:
R1, count 1-2. Pitch is made. Batter foul tips the ball. Cleanly caught by catcher. Unfortunately, base umpire (newbie) loudly announces foul ball. R1 is stealing on the pitch. Catcher does not play on the runner.
They sent the runner back to first and did a "do over" as if the ball were truly foul.
Returning the runner is certainly the correct thing to do because the defense was disadvantaged from playing on the runner. However, should this be considered a strike out? Or is it correct to treat this solely as a foul ball and the batter gets another crack at it?
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
1
Popular Days
Mar 22
4
Top Posters For This Question
noumpere 1 post
maven 1 post
Mad Mike 1 post
ZebraStripes 1 post
Popular Days
Mar 22 2016
4 posts
Popular Posts
maven
We can fix the erroneous "foul ball" call here because the ball did not strike the ground. 2-16-1e thus does NOT govern. That said, I would not rule R1 out unless I were fairly certain that he wo
3 answers to this question
Recommended Posts