Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4513 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

It was too obvious for the Red Sox to ignore. He was really flaunting it. There are so many ways to be more subtle if that's what you're going to do.

  • Like 1
Posted

Cone and Leiter were commenting on Yes and said they used to do that stuff sometimes.  Most pitchers so something "now and then".  Gaylord Perry anyone?

 

Too obvious this time.

  • Like 2
Posted

Funny thing is, he was about to strike out the side and hadn't touched his neck once. The ball (s) didnt have a mark on em.

  • Like 1
Posted

Clearly I am a biased Red Sox fan but I love the WFAN call from NY about how the Sox don't want to start this when they have two pitchers that put oil in their stringy hair to put something on the ball.  What a way to defend such blatant cheating.  I think we all know that many MLB pitchers use something on the ball, but at least make it look like you might be getting guys out legally.

Posted

This rule probably gets broken on a regular basis in MLB. Pineda got EJ'd because he made no effort to conceal it. Obviously he needs it based on his performance last night.

Sent using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted

This rule probably gets broken on a regular basis in MLB. Pineda got EJ'd because he made no effort to conceal it. Obviously he needs it based on his performance last night.

 

Agree with your first sentence.

 

Disagree with your second: he was EJ'd because Farrell requested that the umpires inspect him. "OK, pal, let's see your glove, your hands, oh, lookee here, pine tar on your neck. Buh bye." If Farrell doesn't come out, neither does Pineda.

 

No comment on your third sentence.

Posted

 

This rule probably gets broken on a regular basis in MLB. Pineda got EJ'd because he made no effort to conceal it. Obviously he needs it based on his performance last night.

 

Agree with your first sentence.

 

Disagree with your second: he was EJ'd because Farrell requested that the umpires inspect him. "OK, pal, let's see your glove, your hands, oh, lookee here, pine tar on your neck. Buh bye." If Farrell doesn't come out, neither does Pineda.

 

No comment on your third sentence.

 

OK, seeing you like to pick things apart, read between the lines.  If Pineda is not so blatant and stupid with his application of the pine tar, Farrell stays in the dugout, does not request the inspection and this is a non-issue.  He has said as much in several published interviews.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

 

This rule probably gets broken on a regular basis in MLB. Pineda got EJ'd because he made no effort to conceal it. Obviously he needs it based on his performance last night.

 

Agree with your first sentence.

 

Disagree with your second: he was EJ'd because Farrell requested that the umpires inspect him. "OK, pal, let's see your glove, your hands, oh, lookee here, pine tar on your neck. Buh bye." If Farrell doesn't come out, neither does Pineda.

 

No comment on your third sentence.

 

OK, seeing you like to pick things apart, read between the lines.  If Pineda is not so blatant and stupid with his application of the pine tar, Farrell stays in the dugout, does not request the inspection and this is a non-issue.  He has said as much in several published interviews.

 

 

Sorry to pick apart: occupational hazard, I'm afraid.

 

You might be right about that. But given the history of these 2 teams and Pineda's previous record, it might have been inevitable.

  • Like 1
Posted

How stupid is the baseball "code" on this one. It's illegal, but no one cares as long as you conceal it? Why not just make it legal? 

Posted

I turned on my MLB TV app after the fact to look at this.  I liked a point the Red Sox commentators made; they said batters actually like pine tar being used because more strikes are thrown.  Never really thought of it that way.

Posted

I turned on my MLB TV app after the fact to look at this.  I liked a point the Red Sox commentators made; they said batters actually like pine tar being used because more strikes are thrown.  Never really thought of it that way.

it makes the pitchers more accurate :no:

Posted

 

I turned on my MLB TV app after the fact to look at this.  I liked a point the Red Sox commentators made; they said batters actually like pine tar being used because more strikes are thrown.  Never really thought of it that way.

it makes the pitchers more accurate :no:

 

Kinda like saying pitchers like batters to use corked bats, because it makes the batters swing more.   <_<

Posted

Is there a "Check For Pine Tar" mechanic or procedure? A) Hands... B) Gloves... C) Turn around... 

 

Read Gerry Davis's lips, "That's pine tar." Too funny.

 

I love how everybody starts having their diatribes about who's using pine tar and why and the lack of grip in cold weather. Solution? Build stadiums with roofs and controlled climate interiors. We better have a Congressional inquiry about this, and we really should blame Al Gore and his thinktank for this. Pre-emptive blaming. He said that we're in a Global Warming Crisis, and now we've got Yankee pitchers having to use pine tar because their hands are too cold to grip a ball... in April. Better to blame first and early.

  • Like 1
Posted

How stupid is the baseball "code" on this one. It's illegal, but no one cares as long as you conceal it? Why not just make it legal? 

 

How do you write a rule that says you can use a little -- enough to get a better grip -- but not a lot -- enough to alter that performance of the ball? We may all agree that it's OK to use a little dab so the ball doesn't slip, but what about when someone slathers the whole ball with it?

×
×
  • Create New...