Jump to content

AZump78

Members
  • Posts

    435
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    8

Everything posted by AZump78

  1. Wants-all Fittske's one year old gear he will discard. All Troutko's extra random finds. Needs-too many to list, luckily not gear related. Or maybe not...buying gear is the easiest part of the job...
  2. Bienvenidos!
  3. Amber alert!!!!!
  4. i've got a brand new pair of these, never used and still in the plastic i'll sell for $45.00 and i'll pay the shipping........dns343@aol.com ^^^^^^ Based on the level of ball and desire not to break the bank-I'd take this gentleman up on his offer.
  5. Not to mention-it's the same shoe as the NFL refs wear. : )
  6. Thunder-they do just fine. Ask me how I know!
  7. Lol!
  8. Just order these: http://4.nicekicks.com/wp/files/2011/09/xl454174-001_fl.jpeg?84cd58 They are pretty close and just as good looking. Also, not sure why you would want to polish any Nike shoe. These aren't $50 Reebok Field Magistrates we are talking about. You'd prob want to save these for good fields or conditions and just wipe the clean after use.
  9. Hell Nikes are going for sub 400 on eBay now...almost a bargain!!!!
  10. It's not quite "mesh" like you are thinking-but generally I agree.
  11. Buyer beware the "breathe" version runs a little more narrow in my experience as well.
  12. Not an optimal time of the year to unload gear, much less rare/pricey gear. If top dollar is desired, might want to hold off until spring.
  13. Wait, wait...They play baseball in Canada???
  14. I would have. This is not INT in OBR, no way, no how. Bush? Yep. Just like bunting or stealing when up by 10. Well I would have admired your cajones if that had occurred. I wouldn't go as far as "no way, no how" though. If the umpire had grabbed it and said three words "judgement-willful-deliberate" he would, by rule, have been justified in calling the INT. Just sayin' No, he wouldn't. "Willful and deliberate" is the criteria for the second out. There still has to be an initial basis for the violation. Example: Grounder to F6. F6 starts to flip to F4, at which point R1 slides to the 3B side of 2B. F6 holds the ball instead of flipping. R1 takes out F6 as F6 reaches the bag. This is not "willful and deliberate," because R1 tried to avoid the fielder he thought was going to make the play, even if R1 slid too far wide. I'm pretty sure the 2nd out is what has been discussed the last 4 pages...
  15. Fonzie is a stud...that is all.
  16. Stay out of foul territory... BAD, BAD BAD habit, especially in 2 man.
  17. I would have. This is not INT in OBR, no way, no how. Bush? Yep. Just like bunting or stealing when up by 10. Well I would have admired your cajones if that had occurred. I wouldn't go as far as "no way, no how" though. If the umpire had grabbed it and said three words "judgement-willful-deliberate" he would, by rule, have been justified in calling the INT. Just sayin'
  18. so, are you saying he has carte blanche and no argument either way? No all I am saying is noone would have said a peep criticizing a INT call had it been made.
  19. What mechanics would you use if you were calling interference? Wouldn't you call the force out first? The mechanic he would make is irrelevant, it was the timing that was pointed out.
  20. I am going to say it so feel free to flame away... If Gibby had called it, NOT ONE of you would be posting here saying "he kicked it, that is not INT". It would be all "atta boys" and the like. Can his no call be justified by rule? Some here have shown it indeed can be (not unlike Sammy's IFF call BTW). But, if he had called it would anyone (his CC, MLB supervisors, any one here to a lesser extent) have called him out or criticized the call? I highly doubt it because it would be really easy/obvious to grab. Just my .02
  21. SUPER quick? Uh-Yea! He made the call before the ball left Scutaro's hand! Rewatch and see Thunder.
  22. As an aside: anyone else notice Gibby's SUPER quick timing on the play? Can't help but wonder if that was a factor in the call he made.
  23. Call me a Harry's homer, but the West crew would be my pick, hands down.
  24. I think a buddy of mine put it best: "I could argue either side of it. However, I would rather have to justify to a manager why I did NOT call IFF on this particular batted ball then have to justify to a manager why I DID call it." Its that whole "SH*#ty end of the stick" thing....
×
×
  • Create New...