Jump to content

Protected or Not...that is the question


Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2353 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

FEDS: 8-4-2k Page 55....

The whole standing on the base part and only the infield fly is said vs line drive....

What you guys got

 

99010763-695E-4D80-B836-940C787270F0.png

 

Posted

I would have D, the base is not a refuge except for an infield fly, and while it did indeed pass an infielder, another infielder still was in position to make the play.

  • Like 2
Posted

The more you think about it you can’t get hit by the ball except in an infield fly situation if you are on the bag. Casebook 8-4-2k

Posted

By rule, D all the way.

The base is not a refuge because of a play like this.  The runner could choose to stay there to intentionally interfere knowing F6 (or F4) is making a play on the ball.  

Admittedly, this is tricky since the fielder making the play could reasonably have a double play if the runner does the right thing by moving to get out of the way for the initial play happen.  (IMO it really is disadvantaging the runner by not including protection on any line drive/fly ball on the bag.)

Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2353 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...