Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3598 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

NLCS Game 4 bottom two. Adrian Gonzalez dives headfirst into home. Angel Hernandez bangs him out. Call is upheld upon review. For those of you watching before a video is available, thoughts?

Posted

Personally, I would have been happy to rule his a$$ out, once he got up wagging his finger.  But that's more an emotional response to what I saw on the screen.  (And I'm not gonna lie - the upholding of the call made me very happy.)

And this is what happens when replay is introduced.  Can't wait for the first player/coach to say something at one of my games.  Because once players start showing that sort of disrespect at the MLB level, it WILL filter down.

Posted
Just now, JohnMcSherry said:

CvLvP9CUkAA3PVe.jpg

The issue. ..... and I can see this ..... is that in the photo his hand is above the dish....in the next frame it's hard to tell when the mitt touches AG's person (jersey, face, etc) and you still can't tell if his hand is touching yet....  I've GOT TO GO WITH THIS as being why it was ruled inconclusive

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, JohnMcSherry said:

As close of a call as you can get ... I'm a little chaffed because it changed the game and I enjoy rooting against the Cubs.   

it didn't "change" the game ... you can't say that.

I'm a Cubs fan and I was saying, ..."oh well, safe, 1-0" .....   

Posted
1 minute ago, JohnMcSherry said:

It took the air out of the sails of the Dodgers, you could see it and if you were there you could have probably felt it ... so yes, it changed the game. 

You can't be an umpire and say that, ...you know what I'm saying here....

It may have changed the inning,  but .......

agree to disagree

  • Like 3
Posted
4 minutes ago, JohnMcSherry said:

It took the air out of the sails of the Dodgers, you could see it and if you were there you could have probably felt it ... so yes, it changed the game. 

Feel free not to give up 10 runs after that...

  • Like 6
Posted
2 minutes ago, JohnMcSherry said:

It's all good.  Roberts will have to bring back Kershaw tonight.  Obviously not a "must-win" but if LA loses tonight ...  I don't like their chances moving forward.

Maeda is going tonight

Posted
28 minutes ago, JohnMcSherry said:

If the replay umps had gotten the call right then maybe they wouldn't have felt like giving up 10 runs ...

Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww......those fragile souls.

  • Like 2
Posted

as Gil posted, it was a "call stands" not a "call confirmed"

 

It was a terrible send by the 3BC, he was out by several steps and if (yes I know the play needs to be made) if a bit better throw or proper tag to the plate and not the runner, it would have been a comical out.

 

Posted

This is the instant the glove touched Gonzalez' chin.  I still can't tell if his fingers are touching the plate.  Call stands.  Of course, a local sports radio idiot's topic this morning was, "Is the fix in for the Cubs?"  SMH.

 

Screen Shot 2016-10-20 at 6.54.14 AM.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
2 hours ago, grayhawk said:

This is the instant the glove touched Gonzalez' chin.  I still can't tell if his fingers are touching the plate.  Call stands.  Of course, a local sports radio idiot's topic this morning was, "Is the fix in for the Cubs?"  SMH.

 

Screen Shot 2016-10-20 at 6.54.14 AM.jpg

more importantly ...we can't tell or don't know that the glove didn't touch any of AG's arm/sleeve either..........

  • Like 2
Posted

As much of a LA fan that I am... and trust me I am a big Dodger fan...

In real time, I had an out. At replay it looks close but then again... FAN. Really sending the slowest guy on the team on a short hit to right? Maybe not the best decision they could have made.

Oh... and the 10 runs... maybe not let that happen tonight.

Posted
3 hours ago, GPblue said:

Had to love this one listening to the Rich Eisen Show at lunch.  A caller went "The Tie goes to the runner"

SMH!

A tie does go to the runner semantically in the OBR rules except for an appeal play.

  • Like 1
Posted
25 minutes ago, Jimurray said:

A tie does go to the runner semantically in the OBR rules except for an appeal play.

But, as we all know, there are no ties. Though in this case, a perceived tie goes to the call on the field.

×
×
  • Create New...