Another HR missed with review .....

[Thunderheads]

http://wapc.mlb.com/play/?content_id=28346343&query=umpire

 

[scrounge]

Was it missed? I have no idea from those views? I see nothing that says it hit anything other than the top of the wall. That's what they get for asinine ground rules and not painting the yellow line at the top of the fence.

[Thunderheads]

Was it missed? I have no idea from those views? I see nothing that says it hit anything other than the top of the wall. That's what they get for asinine ground rules and not painting the yellow line at the top of the fence.

I think it was, but that's just what I SEE from the video presented.  That wall is flat on top, ...it had to have hit something else (beyond) to get the trajectory it had, yes?

[JaxRolo]

May be a flat top but it is padding. Whats under the padding?

 

I think it was a good call

[Thunderheads]

May be a flat top but it is padding. Whats under the padding?

 

I think it was a good call

Rolando, what video did you watch?

Please go to 1:51 ....what padding?

 

Come on man, don't always agree with the video results

[noumpere]

Was it missed? I have no idea from those views? I see nothing that says it hit anything other than the top of the wall. That's what they get for asinine ground rules and not painting the yellow line at the top of the fence.

I'm confused - how would painting the top of the wall yellow help with this call?

 

I agree it cant be overturned based on what we saw.

[Thunderheads]

ok ...

here's how I'm looking at it ..... as logically as I can ....

 

It doesn't hit the facing of the wall, correct?  Answer: correct

 

If so, then how does it hit the 'top of the wall' that has no padding and project back on the field?

 

Just thinking out loud here ...

[JaxRolo]

 

May be a flat top but it is padding. Whats under the padding?

 

I think it was a good call

Rolando, what video did you watch?

Please go to 1:51 ....what padding?

 

Come on man, don't always agree with the video results

 

You are correct for a change!     No padding!  But look at all the broken wood and crap on there. Could have hit any of those edges.

[LMSANS]

ok ...

here's how I'm looking at it ..... as logically as I can ....

 

It doesn't hit the facing of the wall, correct?  Answer: correct

 

If so, then how does it hit the 'top of the wall' that has no padding and project back on the field?

 

Just thinking out loud here ...

backspin!  You should see what he can do with a lob wedge!

[Thunderheads]

 

ok ...

here's how I'm looking at it ..... as logically as I can ....

 

It doesn't hit the facing of the wall, correct?  Answer: correct

 

If so, then how does it hit the 'top of the wall' that has no padding and project back on the field?

 

Just thinking out loud here ...

backspin!  You should see what he can do with a lob wedge!

 

   

[HeadHunterLA]

Good call, nothing on that video to overturn it.