- 0
Obstruction Awarding of bases
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 1809 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.
Question
Guest BigVic69
The following rule in Little League says:
"7.06 Obstruction (b) 1: When the ball is not dead on obstruction and an obstructed runner advances beyond the base which, in the umpire’s
judgment, the runner would have been awarded because of being obstructed, the runner does so at his/ her own risk and may be tagged
out. This is a judgment call. "
Scenario:
Runner rounds 2nd base and is obstructed by SS. The runner makes it to 3rd base and decides to try for home. He is put out. The umpire puts him on 3rd due to the obstruction.
The question Is that the laying aside of the out would cause a protestable event?
As it may/may not be a misapplication of 7.06 "the runner does so at his/her own risk and may be tagged out".
However, my point is that the end of the sentence says "This is a judgement call" which lends me to believe that the umpire should have awarded him home instead of placing him on 3rd, if that was the base he would have reached if not obstructed by the SS.
I say that he should have been awarded 1 base past the last base attained, in this case 3rd, and that he put all his chickens in the same basket which reaching for home.
Thanks,
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
1
1
1
Popular Days
May 21
5
May 23
3
May 22
2
Top Posters For This Question
beerguy55 2 posts
maven 1 post
johnpatrick 1 post
Lou B 1 post
Popular Days
May 21 2019
5 posts
May 23 2019
3 posts
May 22 2019
2 posts
Popular Posts
beerguy55
In short, the runner should behave as he would if there were no obstruction - if he's going to assume anything, assume the next base and nothing more - trust the ump to take care of the rest. I've he
9 answers to this question
Recommended Posts