- 0
Moving hands/elbow after coming set
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2990 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question
Nic
How do you rule in this situation? How would you have handled the coach?
11U Cal Ripken OBR
Top of 1st, RH pitcher comes to the set position. Home team is on the first base side.
Pitcher would come set, and continue moving his pitching hand inside his glove, which in turn would move his glove hand.
This was not a part of his routine. It was sporadic from pitch to pitch. It depended on what pitch was called. He would dig in the glove to go from a FB grip to a CB grip.
And occasionally, his elbow would move. Other times, he wouldn't move his hands at all.
I was bothered by a) the glove hand movement, and b) the elbow movement
Moving the glove seems like a false start to me. But the thought that kept popping in my head was, "if I'm running on first, I'm deceived by the elbow moving if I'm going on first movement."
We were asked by director to work with the pitchers in regards to balks this weekend. Meaning we gave a warning first.
After the top of the inning, I walked over to a coach from that team and simply said, "if you could quiet the pitchers' hands once he comes set, I'd appreciate it, coach."
To which he responded, "is he doing it intentionally? The rule is there to not intentionally deceive the runner, IS HE INTENTIONALLY DECEIVING THE RUNNER? NO." Turns his back and leaves. They kept talking about it, and at one point they got mean. "Whys he always acting like he knows SH*#? Why can't he just umpire?"
The coaches are former minor league players who are as arrogant as they come.
But I was unsure of what the threshold is for how much movement of the hands after coming set is allowed. I was taught to come still. But who knows why I was taught that growing up.
So I let it ride the rest of the way today. I wanted to error on side of caution.
But if intent to deceive is a determining factor, it doesnt absolve that deception still exists. I argued intent to deceive doesnt matter. Only that deception is happening.
Thanks in advance!
Top Posters For This Question
4
2
1
1
Popular Days
Jul 9
13
Top Posters For This Question
Nic 4 posts
Rich Ives 2 posts
Kevin_K 1 post
Tborze 1 post
Popular Days
Jul 9 2018
13 posts
Popular Posts
Kevin_K
You gave them a chance to address it. They chose to act like ass hats. If F1 never comes set because something was moving, issue the warning as directed. If F1 moves after coming set, issue the w
Mudisfun
Sadly, the worse part of this tale was the coaches and their reaction. The best answer would have been to tell you "thank you" and that they would say something to the kid, even if they had no plans t
12 answers to this question
Recommended Posts