Jump to content

Race to first ....call stands

Thunderheads

By Thunderheads
in Professional

 Share
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3875 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
Posted

No problem w/ the call on the field ......... but I can't these replays showing Lynn beating Cunningham to the bag ....

 

.

  • Replies 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

BillKen
BillKen

The call on the field is the current status when it goes to NY.  That is the decision of the first judge.  To overturn that judge, the evidence must support something different.  Since we don't get a

Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Although I think Cunningham beat Lynn, I agree with letting the call stand.

I know, I know... :rolleyes:

The above comment cannot be comprehended.  Please try again .... :P 

Honestly, ... you can't have it both ways

scrounge

scrounge

Posted
Posted

TIE!!!

In all seriousness, he may have beat the fielder by a microsecond...but IMO, the evidence is insufficient to meet the threshold of a reversal. Call stands.

Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
  • Author
Posted

TIE!!!

In all seriousness, he may have beat the fielder by a microsecond...but IMO, the evidence is insufficient to meet the threshold of a reversal. Call stands.

lol ...

well ......look at it this way ......you don't have Lynn beating him to the bag, do you?  I certainly don't ......   I've seen closer plays reversed this year with replay.  It was very inconsistent this season ......

DVA7130

DVA7130

Posted
Posted

TIE!!!

In all seriousness, he may have beat the fielder by a microsecond...but IMO, the evidence is insufficient to meet the threshold of a reversal. Call stands.

Don't bring out the fools and their "tie" arguments...

BillKen

BillKen

Posted
Posted

The call on the field is the current status when it goes to NY.  That is the decision of the first judge.  To overturn that judge, the evidence must support something different.  Since we don't get a ground level view from RF zoomed in on 1B in HD Slow-Mo...there isn't sufficient evidence to overturn the call.  Call Stands.

Plus...everyone knows a tie goes to the umpire!

  • Like 1
Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
  • Author
Posted

The call on the field is the current status when it goes to NY.  That is the decision of the first judge.  To overturn that judge, the evidence must support something different.  Since we don't get a ground level view from RF zoomed in on 1B in HD Slow-Mo...there isn't sufficient evidence to overturn the call.  Call Stands.

Plus...everyone knows a tie goes to the umpire!

do you feel you needed another view?

DVA7130

DVA7130

Posted
Posted

even if you saw the opposite ...

Not second-guessing other umpires when not asked, it's contagious!

Thunderheads

Thunderheads

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Not second-guessing other umpires when not asked, it's contagious!

good Lord don't second guess ANYTHING!?!??  blasphemy?!?  :no: 

Again, ...no problem w/ the call on the field.  Replay is in place (like it or not) to GET IT RIGHT .... I consistently see them not doing so....and in my opinion, this was missed when it shouldn't have.  But hey ,....  that's me! LOL

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...