Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4786 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I'm assuming Jeff means the discussion with Porter was too long. Maybe, but they kept him in the game, when it wasn't clear that he wanted to go. He gets a little more rope when the call is changed, provided he keeps a civil tongue in his head (which he did).

  • Like 1
Posted

I've noticed a generational difference. As you know, "old school" umpiring was about making your call and sticking to it. "New school" is about getting it right.

 

Well, I have seen "old school" and "new school" managers. A vet like Jim Leyland would have gotten himself run if that reversal had gone against him. But a newer manager like Porter has come up with the "get it right" mentality, understands that it's good for the game, and will bark about it enough to make a point but without getting tossed.

 

This is a generalization, so there are exceptions, but observe what the skipper does next time when the umpires "get it right."

Posted

Positioning - I think Cooper set up in a good place, expecting to see a swipe tag kind of like 3BX - but he was in a bad place to see a tag on the back.

Would something more in between (less to the outfield), have been better?

Posted

I don't have a problem in a four man asking, in a two man, no way am I asking. Hows that for a cross between old school and new school. The fact remains, they asked, it went against him, explain it briefly and send him to the dugout. If he is truly a new school manager then he needs to understand that you have to live and die by it. Sometimes it goes for you, sometimes it doesn't. 

×
×
  • Create New...