Jump to content
  • 0

Set Position


Guest Pitching Coach
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3872 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

Guest Pitching Coach
Posted

Had an umpire tell my pitcher the other day that when he is working out of the set, that his entire pivot foot had to be in contact with the rubber.  He is a junior and has been pitching this way as long as he has been with me (3 years), and this is the first that anyone has ever said anything to him.  The umpire told him to change it or he would start calling a balk on him, so he did for the remainder of the game.  Next game we played, I asked the umpires doing the games what they thought, and their response was who cares.  Is this something new or what is the deal?    

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Looks like this is HS? So it would be Fed rules. 6-1-3 says that he has to have his whole pivot foot in contact with the rubber. 

  • 0
Posted
Had an umpire tell my pitcher the other day that when he is working out of the set, that his entire pivot foot had to be in contact with the rubber.  He is a junior and has been pitching this way as long as he has been with me (3 years), and this is the first that anyone has ever said anything to him.  The umpire told him to change it or he would start calling a balk on him, so he did for the remainder of the game.  Next game we played, I asked the umpires doing the games what they thought, and their response was who cares.  Is this something new or what is the deal?    

This was a point of emphasis in Spring 2013 in order to clarify that the 'hybrid position' was illegal in HS.

By black and white rule, your pitchers pivot foot (while in the stretch) must be COMPLETELY in front of the 24" of the pitcher's plate. Most associations, I imagine, have taught a preventive umpiring way of handling this (get the catcher to tell him, fix him during warm ups)... But most HS umpires just don't care because it's not a major aspect to the playing rules in their eyes.

Honestly, I'm not gonna be nit-picky. If a toe or heel is an inch or three off the rubber, I can just claim that it's a non- issue. I normally say something when it's obvious the pitcher's foot is extended past the rubber (half of the foot or so).

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

  • 0
Posted
8 minutes ago, noumpere said:

The umpire is correct and this should be strictly, strictly enforced.  It's one of the main reasons the base umpire brushes off the rubber between innings.

I just about sprayed my monitor with HI-C.  

  • Like 3
  • 0
Posted
18 minutes ago, noumpere said:

The umpire is correct and this should be strictly, strictly enforced.  It's one of the main reasons the base umpire brushes off the rubber between innings.

Yeah, it's all fun and games today, but this will stick to you tomorrow!

  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted
1 hour ago, maven said:

Not that there's anything wrong with that.

(Does that bit still play in the era of marriage equality?)

Someone is offending by anything you say these days, so who knows.

 

Swinging strike three...."He didn't mean to go"

  • 0
Posted
7 hours ago, udbrky said:

Looks like this is HS? So it would be Fed rules. 6-1-3 says that he has to have his whole pivot foot in contact with the rubber. 

6-1-3 says "his entire pivot foot in contact with or directly in front of and parallel to the pitcher's plate." So the side of his foot can be up against the front edge of the rubber and he'd be fine.

  • 0
Posted
4 hours ago, ElkOil said:

6-1-3 says "his entire pivot foot in contact with or directly in front of and parallel to the pitcher's plate." So the side of his foot can be up against the front edge of the rubber and he'd be fine.

Yeah. I didn't edit that in, I almost did.

×
×
  • Create New...