INT ...again, at first .........

[Thunderheads]

You know ....it's funny .......... NOTHING changes here on this type of call.  You still have one out, and R1.

 

http://m.mlb.com/video/v33997647

 

[JaxRolo]

Nit-picky BUT it is interference.

[JHSump]

Could make a big difference if Bobby Fastdude is R1 and Joe McSlowboat is BR!

[Thunderheads]

Could make a big difference if Bobby Fastdude is R1 and Joe McSlowboat is BR!

understood ..........BUT.......

 

1 out, R1.

 

NO INTERFERENCE

 

1 out, R1

[scrounge]

Joe Maddon must be arguing just for arguing's sake at this point....he's gotta know you can't get 2 outs on this

[Thunderheads]

Joe Maddon must be arguing just for arguing's sake at this point....he's gotta know you can't get 2 outs on this

not so fast scrounge! LOL

[maven]

You know ....it's funny .......... NOTHING changes here on this type of call.  You still have one out, and R1.

 

 

How do you figure? When the video begins there are no outs, R1. Now, there's one out, R1.

 

U1 does get to use just one signal for INT and fair ball. Now that's efficient umpiring.

[Thunderheads]

 

You know ....it's funny .......... NOTHING changes here on this type of call.  You still have one out, and R1.

 

 

How do you figure? When the video begins there are no outs, R1. Now, there's one out, R1.

 

Jesus, maven ......do I have to explain this to you , really?

[maven]

Jesus, maven ......do I have to explain this to you , really?

OIC. You're saying the outcome is the same since he caught the ball. Either R1 is out or BR is out on the catch. Gotcha.

 

Except of course that it wasn't a catch.

[Thunderheads]

 

Jesus, maven ......do I have to explain this to you , really?

OIC. You're saying the outcome is the same since he caught the ball. Either R1 is out or BR is out on the catch. Gotcha.

 

Except of course that it wasn't a catch.

 

stop it!

YES, the outcome is the same ........in this particular situation, yes, it's the same ....... R1, 1 out.

[JaxRolo]

Different runner!