Jump to content
  • 0

Home Plate Interference


Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4601 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

Posted

Had an issue at Home plate that I need feedback on. R3, R2. Right Handed Batter is in the box when the pitch is made, pitch get's by catcher on the 3rd base side of the plate, R3 is stealing home. Pitcher is coming into cover home plate. Batter get's out of the box moving to the opposite side, First Base Side, is the Batter out?

 

My call was not out, she left a congested area as a play was being made at home to avoid interference.

 

Feed back 

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

Agree with @Matt.

 

Your reference to 'she' makes me think this might be softball, about which I know almost nothing.

 

The baseball rule requires the batter to vacate the area needed by the defense, so as not to hinder the play. It sounds as if this batter did exactly that: crossing the plate is irrelevant. No hindrance = no INT, at least for baseball.

  • 0
Posted

Had an issue at Home plate that I need feedback on. R3, R2. Right Handed Batter is in the box when the pitch is made, pitch get's by catcher on the 3rd base side of the plate, R3 is stealing home. Pitcher is coming into cover home plate. Batter get's out of the box moving to the opposite side, First Base Side, is the Batter out?

 

My call was not out, she left a congested area as a play was being made at home to avoid interference.

 

Feed back 

I agree with what's been posted, but my question is: Why are you inquiring if there's an out here? Out due to what?

  • 0
Posted

Rather than backing out of the box they went across the plate past the other box towards the first about 20ft. The defensive manager went ballistic, so I just needed a reaffirmation of my call.

  • 0
Posted

Rather than backing out of the box they went across the plate past the other box towards the first about 20ft. The defensive manager went ballistic, so I just needed a reaffirmation of my call.

Ok, why did he go ballistic?  What was his issue?

 

Why did you even consider an out? Just because the coach wanted it?

 

I'm not trying to be difficult, just trying to figure out why you even would consider this to be an out?

  • 0
Posted

I have no Idea why he went ballistic. I didn't consider it.

ok, then why are you asking the question if the batter is out?

 

I'm sorry I'm just confused here :shrug:

  • 0
Posted

I have no Idea why he went ballistic.

 

In a respectful tone: "Coach, if you have a question, I'll be happy to answer it. But I'm not listening to that."

 

Don't permit coaches to rant and rave. It sets a bad example for the kids, the other daddy-coaches, and everyone else. They sometimes (though less and less) see it in the pro game and infer that it's appropriate at every level. It is not.

 

If he can't settle down, he can rant to his steering wheel. We need not listen to it.

  • Like 2
  • 0
Posted

Agree vehemently :) with @maven.  The first order of business is to get the behavior under control.  If he can't (or won't) control himself, there is no conversation to be had here.

 

I missed the "ballistic" part in the OP.

  • 0
Posted

Something to the effect of, "Whoa, whoa, whoa coach!  You need to knock that off NOW!  Ok, do you have a question!"

  • 0
Posted

Something to the effect of, "Whoa, whoa, whoa coach!  You need to knock that off NOW!  Ok, do you have a question!"

 

The first part (getting coach's attention) is OK, could be a little confrontational depending on delivery.

 

I try to avoid telling coaches what to do (or what they need).

 

I put "I'll be happy to answer your question" first, because it prioritizes what coach wants, which is to have his say. FIRST, he hears that he will get to have his say, THEN he hears that he has to behave.

 

In behavior modification, this order is important. :)

  • 0
Posted

Rather than backing out of the box they went across the plate past the other box towards the first about 20ft. The defensive manager went ballistic, so I just needed a reaffirmation of my call.

 

Why would it even cross anyone's mind that this was some kind of rule violation?

  • 0
Posted

 

Rather than backing out of the box they went across the plate past the other box towards the first about 20ft. The defensive manager went ballistic, so I just needed a reaffirmation of my call.

 

Why would it even cross anyone's mind that this was some kind of rule violation?

 

 

Coach lost his mind. Nothing to cross.

×
×
  • Create New...