Register or Sign In to remove these ads

maven

Members
  • Content count

    6,538
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    193

maven last won the day on August 11

maven had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

3,849 Excellent

3 Followers

About maven

  • Rank
    Rules Interpreter

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling
  • Location
    Neck o' the Woods, OH

More information about you

  • Your Association Name
    SUA
  • How did you hear about Umpire-Empire?

Recent Profile Visitors

8,376 profile views
  1. That would be a different play. We could change the play in thousands of ways and generate thousands of posts that don't answer the question posed by the OP. Sometimes an analogy can help illuminate an explanation, but again focus is key.
  2. FIFY. The OP reports that R3 "tags up." No fourth out appeal should be granted.
  3. No biggie. Frankly, I didn't even notice the first time I read it that the post had "out of bounds."
  4. That's a pretty long narrative for a play where the offense advanced no runners and the defense recorded no outs.
  5. It's not just you. Tortured syntax is a by-product of committees writing.
  6. First of all, I suspect that by "out of bounds" the OP meant "foul ground." It would be highly unusual for a ball that lands anywhere in fair territory to go out of play before 1B. If that's right, then OP doesn't say whether the ball passed first base, nor, if it did, where it was when it passed the base. It says only that the ball touched both fair and foul ground before the base. That's not enough info to answer the question. Part of the problem with people not knowing the definition of fair/foul is that they don't know how much information to provide when asking about a particular play.
  7. Could not be caught with ordinary effort. Looks like a brain fart. Nice to have replay.
  8. Depending on whether the contact hindered F2's further play, this might also be INT: in codes where hurdling is illegal, resulting contact that hinders the fielder will also be illegal.
  9. If you have a legitimate umpiring question, feel free to post it. Arguing about cheating umpires is not appropriate for this site. There are plenty of other places on the internet where people will engage with your apparent desire to be right about how bad umpires are.
  10. Also called the "push": U1 comes in to pivot and takes the BR into 2B, as U2 takes R1 into 3B. Triggered with R1&R2 or bases loaded when U3 goes out.
  11. I think that's misleading. The fielder moving to tag the runner IS a physical tag attempt. He doesn't have to do anything more than that.
  12. I do. F4 runs right at him with the ball. Your threshold for "tag attempt" might need revision.
  13. RLI

    Remember that RLI has 3 necessary elements, without any one of which we properly no-call: Runner out of the lane by rule A throw to a fielder at 1B (not necessarily quality) Hindrance of the fielder taking the throw by the BR due to his illegal position The interp is based on the fact that, when the fielders play "inside" and the BR is "outside," his illegal position did not hinder the fielder taking the throw. If you want to read the case play as sneaking in the quality concept, that's probably not far off base. But it is firmly grounded in the baseball fundamental that no hindrance = no INT.