Jump to content
  • 0

baserunner running inside the 1st baseline and running into 1st baseman in cws


Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4841 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

Posted

In the miss state and ucla game 1 of the cws, a ucla batter either bunted or hit a weak ball in front of the plate.  the catcher fielded the ball and threw it to 1st.  the batter/runner never crossed the right field line into the runner's lane and ran into the 1st baseman..  in my opinion, he should have been out for interference.  nothing was called and no coach questioned the call.  did anyelse see this?

 

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

The poorly thrown ball arrived unimpeded before the runner. F3 was unimpeded as he botched the catch. After that the B-R collided with F3. Too bad. Not the runner's fault.

Mr. Ives, that is a very good answer so I won't add anything to it.

  • 0
Posted
A QUALITY throw is necessary to get interference.
What is a quality throw?
  • 0
Posted

 

A QUALITY throw is necessary to get interference.
What is a quality throw?

 

One that, in the umpire's judgment, F3 would have caught, absent the INT.

  • 0
Posted
A QUALITY throw is necessary to get interference.
What is a quality throw? One that, in the umpire's judgment, F3 would have caught, absent the INT. So maybe more like a quality catch?
  • 0
Posted
A QUALITY throw is necessary to get interference.
What is a quality throw? One that, in the umpire's judgment, F3 would have caught, absent the INT. So maybe more like a quality catch? If F3 catches the throw, how would you have INT?
  • 0
Posted
What is a quality throw?
One that, in the umpire's judgment, F3 would have caught, absent the INT. So maybe more like a quality catch? If F3 catches the throw, how would you have INT? Exactly. What if F3 just drops it? "Quality throw" is not a good term. We need to determine whether there is Int or not. Period. If F2 just makes a throw that F3 has no chance of catching then obviously there was no int.
  • 0
Posted
Exactly. What if F3 just drops it? "Quality throw" is not a good term. We need to determine whether there is Int or not. Period. If F2 just makes a throw that F3 has no chance of catching then obviously there was no int.

 

Because it wasn't a quality throw.  You seem to be trying to define it backwards.

  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted
Exactly. What if F3 just drops it? "Quality throw" is not a good term. We need to determine whether there is Int or not. Period. If F2 just makes a throw that F3 has no chance of catching then obviously there was no int.
Because it wasn't a quality throw. You seem to be trying to define it backwards. Yes!!! That is what they taught us at the Wendelstad Clinic last week!!! He said they do not use quality throw at the 5 week school
×
×
  • Create New...