Leaderboard

So what we are trying to say is that each batter possibly has two strike zones? One for the PU and one for the computer. And, the hollow of the knee or the top of the zone for each player could be an inch or two different? Yeah, doesnt seem like there will be any issues there. There has to be some instance of this already where the PU called the low strike (which was correct) but was overturned by computer because the math didnt reach that low. No wonder the union wanted all or nothing. Maybe Meta glasses will be introduced that can adjust automatically for each batter... Call what you call and be confident with it. If it is challenged and changed, dont let it get in your head. What else can you do?

Thanks, @Velho...as I suspected, it seems they are changing the definition of the strike zone to accommodate the limits of the ABS tech (which fundamentally changes the game and it's not being applied equally to all players...) instead of looking at other procedures and policies that ALLOW for the limitations of the ABS technology while ALSO maintaining the existing codified, rulebook definition of the strike zone. Whether you agree or disagree with how MLB is proceeding, this is the beginning of a landmark moment and possibly a new era of The Game at its highest level... ~Dawg

I just really don't like where they are with the technology currently. The technology is not able to consistently plot the vertical axis. According to that article, the "compromise" mentioned was "...based on the batter's height." Respectfully, that's garbage. The implication there is that EVERY human being of the same height has the same vertical limits to their strike zone. There are guys who are 6'2" who have short torsos and long legs and there are guys who are 6'2" who have long torsos and short legs. The hollow of the knees on both of those guys is NOT going to be in the same place. I don't know if this is a practical solution but, at the start of every season and every post-season all players should have their strike zones mapped. Take some BP and have cameras documenting each players pre-swing positioning. And average out the vertical limits through the session. Send a team of people from the league's office around to each club. Callups should have there's done, too...not sure mechanically what that looks like. Maybe once all players are drafted, they should be mapped. We know eventually the technology will catch up and they will be able to accurately and consistently plot the vertical. Until then, we have to do other things to achieve the objective. ~Dawg

Concur. All one way (full ABS) or the other (no challenges). All challenges will do is highlight the missed calls by the PU, so why would the union find it acceptable?

Based on the knowledge gained when I bought my 2300s, 1800s may be few and far between. I couldn't find any online (granted, I was looking for new ones).

I don't blame them. Why not?

I did the same thing with a cobbler to three pairs of plate shoes. Held up all season and ready for upcoming season.

Apparently, not simply perfect.