Leaderboard

I think we both know how that's going to go.

I'd be stoked to have ABS make the ball/strike calls for me full time, as long as the powers that be don't use it as an excuse to reduce pay.

Strike Zone, Whatever you do, be sure to include some sessions on game management. In my many years of experience, this is the most overlooked part of umpire training. Newly trained umpires are fair at mechanics and rules, but, because of the lack of game management sessions, they have no idea how to handle coaches, or de-escalating game situations.

Aaahhhh!! The old MSU approach to umpiring!

This is another one I avoid when it comes up, as entertaining it, only makes way for protracted arguing with the coach. When coaches try to bring up calls from earlier, I shut it down with: "Tom/coach, we are only talking about the current call.." I learned this the hard way and I've had coaches try and bring calls up from past games, some where I wasn't even the PU. I will explain the rule for the current call if it needs explaining, but won't let it turn into an umpire 101 class during the game. Since I am also the President of the League, when I hold the Team manager meetings prior to the start of the season, I go over the Local rule book, primarily updates/changes and the admin stuff, I also have my UIC there and we both address coaches questions about rules and explain some of the more common issues we see. We've found that in this environment where everyone is calm, that we can address scenarios and explain the rules. This has helped cut down on field coach conflicts a good deal for us and also get to know each other better.

As we say in the military..."That's a technique". If it works for you, then, use it. The issue I see with the example you gave is that you are leading on and encouraging the interaction to continue by your replies; you are inviting the coach to continue( you didn't mention if he was yelling or asking calmly). In either case, let him get it all out before responding, no need for your first 2 comments. Once he got to "the rule says" and or stops talking, then you can respond. The best method I have found, even outside of baseball, is to follow and do this: Listen, Pause, Think, and Respond. Listen to what he is saying, meaning active listening, not just waiting to respond with your answer, even if it is obvious to you. Pause, this is a brief pause for you to formulate your reply and to also make it more of a normal exchange and not a back and forth shouting match, even if he is yelling. Think, given the circumstances (yelling, calm, how the game has progressed good/bad at that point) of how you will compose your reply to the situation that also addresses his issue that you identified back at the Listen part of this. Once you have your reply, calmly state it and explain if it requires it. So I use the acronym LPTR to remind myself when I see arms flailing and speed walking coaches coming from the dugout. In your scenario/situation, I would have let him have his say and when he stated "the rule says" and stopped talking, I would explain to him how "that rule" works. Something like: "Tom/Coach, that rule is for a runner in fair territory being hit by a fair ball. The ball was hit foul and the player was in foul territory, so it is foul ball, ball is dead and runners return to their bases at TOP." Context is important in this, as mentioned, has it been a heated game, is the coach calm/yelling, been confrontational all game, etc? Your reply may be shorter and more direct to shut down any further discussion if warranted. If after doing this, he is still going on, then escalate in the usual manner with a definitive ending statement like “The call stands. We’re done. Let’s play.” or “That’s enough. Return to the dugout.”

#2 Beerguy55, that's a pretty funny response. But, to answer the OP, I don't answer statements. If it's a question I will answer. I have found the fastest way to end a conversation that involves a rule interpretation is to say, "Coach if you think I'm wrong, play the game under protest. Otherwise, we are playing ball. What do you want to do?"

I'm frankly surprised by that because in my experience the most common response you're going to get from a misinformed coach would be "yes" and then it would spiral into a discussion about whether or not the rule book can be pulled out. I see one of two appropriate responses to the coach who is angry over this scenario: 1. You're free to protest, do you wish to do that? 2. Get on your knees and tongue jiggle my left nut.

As somebody who does both baseball and softball: Get ready to learn new sets of rules. I dipped a toe into rec softball after moving next to a park, and didn't realize how much I didn't know until I got high school certified for both baseball and softball last year. (I had done LL baseball pretty heavily for about seven years, and learned major differences in baseball codes.) Obstruction, for one, is penalized very differently. OTOH learning LL baseball mechanics tends to help with softball.

He was working alone behind the plate so no partner in the field. I totally understand not changing a call due to outside influences, especially fans or an angry coach. My issue was his explanation to me when I questioned why he ruled the runner safe, as if it was simply a matter of the ball getting dislodged. When I said the first baseman stepped on the bag before the runner even arrived and a tag was attempted he said it didn't matter because he stayed in the base path and the runner has a right to that space as well so if the ball becomes dislodged the runner is safe. On a bang bang play I could see that being the case as possession isn't fully attained but the kid took two steps to first base with the ball in his glove and then waited for the runner.