NEVER GIVE UP!!!!

[Thunderheads]

http://www.mlb.com/v...780550&c_id=mlb

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=24745861&topic_id=9780550&c_id=mlb&tcid=vpp_copy_24745861&v=3

[dumbdumb]

Doesn't the interference (grabbing the uniform) by the runner at .16 cause the pitcher to be unable to make a play on the runner at 2nd who was too far off second. Wouldn't this interference be invoke in a couple different rule sets?

[Thunderheads]

Doesn't the interference (grabbing the uniform) by the runner at .16 cause the pitcher to be unable to make a play on the runner at 2nd who was too far off second. Wouldn't this interference be invoke in a couple different rule sets?

?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

[Dannytheman]

Doesn't the interference (grabbing the uniform) by the runner at .16 cause the pitcher to be unable to make a play on the runner at 2nd who was too far off second. Wouldn't this interference be invoke in a couple different rule sets?

Uhhhhh, no.

[noumpere]

Doesn't the interference (grabbing the uniform) by the runner at .16 cause the pitcher to be unable to make a play on the runner at 2nd who was too far off second. Wouldn't this interference be invoke in a couple different rule sets?

yes and it was also unsporting so he should of been ejected. and he should be fined in his teams kangaroo court for not plowing over the pitcher who was clearly in the baseline and so was fair game.

[BRUMP]

That's why you run it out.

[JaxRolo]

Doesn't the interference (grabbing the uniform) by the runner at .16 cause the pitcher to be unable to make a play on the runner at 2nd who was too far off second. Wouldn't this interference be invoke in a couple different rule sets?

Don't see it. You might be reading to much into it.

[Haid D' Salaami]

Not one person talked about the PU and how far up the line he got.. that is awesome to see.

[Mudder]

Not one person talked about the PU and how far up the line he got.. that is awesome to see.

I saw that too, great hustle, but do you think as he was running up the line, knowing the BR is behind him, that maybe should have moved to the left to allow room for the BR?

[UMP45]

Doesn't the interference (grabbing the uniform) by the runner at .16 cause the pitcher to be unable to make a play on the runner at 2nd who was too far off second. Wouldn't this interference be invoke in a couple different rule sets?

yes and it was also unsporting so he should of been ejected. and he should be fined in his teams kangaroo court for not plowing over the pitcher who was clearly in the baseline and so was fair game.

noumpere I hope you said this with tongue firmly in cheek! :wow:

[noumpere]

I saw that too, great hustle, but do you think as he was running up the line, knowing the BR is behind him, that maybe should have moved to the left to allow room for the BR?

If the batter chooses not to run and then gets behind the umpire too bad for the batter.

noumpere I hope you said this with tongue firmly in cheek!

It was no more outragious than dumbdumbs statement. I thought we were both just having fun with it.

[Thunderheads]

that's what the smileys are for fellas! Makes things MUCH easier to "read" / feel. :nod:

[JaxRolo]

I wonder what BR was thinking when he saw PU running by him.

[JaxRolo]

that's what the smileys are for fellas! Makes things MUCH easier to "read" / feel.

Smilies on the iPhone do t always translate well to the site

[BRUMP]

that's what the smileys are for fellas! Makes things MUCH easier to "read" / feel.

Smilies on the iPhone do t always translate well to the site

Yes Im hesitant to joke when using tapatalk because people may not get that its a joke.