Angel Hernandez's Balk in NY & Plate Blocking in SD

[Lindsay]

Angel Hernandez called a balk on Yankees pitcher while Replay Review awarded Los Angeles a run thanks to Padres catcher Gary Sanchez's plate blocking violation in San Diego. We answer your questions about each play.

Yankees Balk

In the 6th inning of Sunday's Astros-Yankees game, HP Umpire Angel Hernandez called a balk on Yankees pitcher Wandy Peralta for failing to step directly to first base on a pickoff throw with baserunner Chas McCormick at first. Official Baseball Rule 6.02(a)(3) regarding balks states, "It is a balk when the pitcher, while touching their plate, fails to step directly toward a base before throwing to that base."

Replays indicate a balk did occur as Peralta appeared to step toward home plate more than toward first base, but complicating perception was that Hernandez was the only umpire to call it. Even so, although 1B Umpire Todd Tichenor or 3B Umpire Alex Tosi called the balk, it still was a step balk.

Padres Block

With runners at the corners and one out in the top of the 2nd inning of Sunday's Dodgers-Padres game, Dodgers batter Austin Barnes bunted the ball to Padres first baseman Ji Man Choi, who charged in and flipped the ball to catcher Sanchez as Dodgers baserunner R3 Enrique Hernandez slid head-first into Sanchez's knee, ruled out by HP Umpire Gabe Morales.

After Dodgers manager Dave Roberts challenged the play, Replay Review overturned Morales' out call, deeming that catcher Sanchez did block the runner, despite the throw originating from a drawn in infielder.

Although plate blocking rule OBR 6.01(i)(2) states, "It shall not be considered a violation of this Rule 6.01(i)(2) if the catcher blocks the pathway of the runner in a legitimate attempt to field the throw (e.g., in reaction to the direction, trajectory or the hop of the incoming throw, or in reaction to a throw that originates from a pitcher or drawn-in infielder)," a throw from a drawn-in infielder doesn't give a catcher carte blanche to block access to home plate. The difference is whether the catcher's blocking was intentional or unintentional.

For outfield throws, for instance, we know that catchers may be called for blocking (without the ball) whether they did it intentionally or unintentionally, but for the drawn-in infielder exception, this ruling indicates that while unintentional blocking is permitted for a drawn-in infielder throw, intentionally blocking the plate by sticking a knee out unecessarily is still illegal.

Video as follows:

Alternate Link: Recapping Angel Hernandez's balk in New York & Gabe Morales' block in San Diego

View the full article

[Thunderheads]

That's a balk all day, ... at any level

[The Man in Blue]

... and (as said) not called often enough.

 

I still disagree with the 45-degree interpretation.  If the rule said "step toward the base" then I would be fine with it.  However, the rule says "step directly toward the base" ... 45-degrees is not direct.

[maven]

Man, they still don't know what they want with the HP collision/block rule. How many years have they been "finalizing" that rule, 5? 6? 

Hanging the call on F2's intent to block is not the bright line they need for these plays.

[beerguy55]

14 hours ago, The Man in Blue said:

... and (as said) not called often enough.

 

I still disagree with the 45-degree interpretation.  If the rule said "step toward the base" then I would be fine with it.  However, the rule says "step directly toward the base" ... 45-degrees is not direct.

Anything but 0 degrees is not direct.  I'm not even sure if it's physically possible for a human to stay on the rubber, and step directly towards first base...and not cross the plane of the rubber.

[Vegas_Ump]

Then there was Andy Pettitte........

Mike

Las Vegas