Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3775 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

6.01(a) PENALTY discusses where to place runners after interference has occurred. It has the concept of an intervening play.

Quote

In the event the batter-runner has not reached first base,
all runners shall return to the base last occupied at the time of
the pitch; provided, however, if during an intervening play at the
plate with less than two outs a runner scores, and then the batterrunner
is called out for interference outside the three-foot lane,
the runner is safe and the run shall count.

What if no intervening play is made - as in the defense does not attempt to get R3 out.

I have seen many squeeze plays executed so well that the pitcher fields the ball and only makes a play on the BR. In these situations, R3 has scored well before any throw is completed to first.

This would not matter in FED since we place runners TOI after interference, but how would we handle in OBR/NCAA.

Posted
15 minutes ago, goody14 said:

6.01(a) PENALTY discusses where to place runners after interference has occurred. It has the concept of an intervening play.

What if no intervening play is made - as in the defense does not attempt to get R3 out.

I have seen many squeeze plays executed so well that the pitcher fields the ball and only makes a play on the BR. In these situations, R3 has scored well before any throw is completed to first.

This would not matter in FED since we place runners TOI after interference, but how would we handle in OBR/NCAA.

If no intervening play is made, then that clause doesn't apply.  Return the runners.

Posted
25 minutes ago, goody14 said:

This would not matter in FED since we place runners TOI after interference, but how would we handle in OBR/NCAA.

By rule, you're correct for FED about placing runners.

Another forum member PM'ed me this very question the other day, and I'll tell you what I told him: with no intervening play, unless R3's already in or near the dugout, I'm pretty sure that runner hadn't scored at TOI.

Posted
By rule, you're correct for FED about placing runners.

Another forum member PM'ed me this very question the other day, and I'll tell you what I told him: with no intervening play, unless R3's already in or near the dugout, I'm pretty sure that runner hadn't scored at TOI.

It's easy enough to tell because PU should be 1BLX on a play like this. Everything is lined up right in front of him.

  • Like 1
Posted
It's easy enough to tell because PU should be 1BLX on a play like this. Everything is lined up right in front of him.

Had it this year as PU in FED. R3 crossed in front of me on a bunt up 1BL (easily fair). I see the R3 touch and quickly move up towards 1B for the play at 1B. Easy RLI with R3 scoring. Both coaches came out to question the varying aspects. Easy explanations and game continues.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

Posted
1 hour ago, ALStripes17 said:

Had it this year as PU in FED. R3 crossed in front of me on a bunt up 1BL (easily fair). I see the R3 touch and quickly move up towards 1B for the play at 1B. Easy RLI with R3 scoring. Both coaches came out to question the varying aspects. Easy explanations and game continues.

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

I agree 100%...but let's say R3 had NOT hit plate prior to RLI.  You'd send him back to 3rd, right?

The toughest part of this would be WHEN did the RLI actually occur?  Does it occur when:

a. BR passes 45' outside the lane

b. Defender sets up for throw

c. Defender makes throw

 

Posted
I agree 100%...but let's say R3 had NOT hit plate prior to RLI.  You'd send him back to 3rd, right?

The toughest part of this would be WHEN did the RLI actually occur?  Does it occur when:

a. BR passes 45' outside the lane

b. Defender sets up for throw

c. Defender makes throw

 

Whenever we judge the hindrance actually occurred... Big bucks...

Yes R3 would go back if he had not crossed the plate prior to the INT

Sent from my XT1254 using Tapatalk

  • Like 1
Posted
41 minutes ago, FleasOf1000Camels said:

I agree 100%...but let's say R3 had NOT hit plate prior to RLI.  You'd send him back to 3rd, right?

The toughest part of this would be WHEN did the RLI actually occur?  Does it occur when:

a. BR passes 45' outside the lane

b. Defender sets up for throw

c. Defender makes throw

 

Can't possibly be before C.  Might be after.

×
×
  • Create New...