Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 5162 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

OK

Here is the use of histrionic gestures (i.e., jumping up and down, violently waving arms or demonstrations) while arguing with the umpire are grounds for ejection.

Well guess what happened.

Although I think the play was called correctly, at 1:12 of this play is where you can look at the play unfolding.

The PU goes straight back all the way into the grass for the point position almost touching the tip of the artwork behind home plate. The runner has tagged and is almost 1/2 way home, now the umpire tries to start getting to the 3rd baseline extending in time to be set for the play. At 1:20 he is still on the move as the runner is getting ready to hit the dirt at 1:21 and the tag at 1:22 and again at 1:34. Just looks like he dropped a little to deep to get completely set at 3BLE. That deep on a 2 man or 3 man may be justified since the plate umpire has the tag at 3rd, but in a 4 man the 3BU has the tag. Either way, as soon as the runner takes off the PU has to get on his horse for the play at 3BLE from a deep point position. Just IMHO which is why he is there and I am stuck watching replays and reading as much as I can for my backyard whiffle ball games.

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I guess at least the mask wasn't thrown at the umpire this time. He learned that much from the offseason.

Now, I suppose he went that far back to get a view of the runner, F2, and the throw. Then, decided there would be a play and decided to walk into position. Even in a 4 man, I'd be OK with him getting deep to read everything and decide where he needs to be on the play. But, the walking is uncalled for. Even if he did get the call correct, his mechanics looked lazy. He was not set. He was walking to his position. And, he wasn't in proper position at the moment the play occurred.

I know who the PU is and Finn would probably love to comment on this.

Posted

I guess at least the mask wasn't thrown at the umpire this time. He learned that much from the offseason.

Now, I suppose he went that far back to get a view of the runner, F2, and the throw. Then, decided there would be a play and decided to walk into position. Even in a 4 man, I'd be OK with him getting deep to read everything and decide where he needs to be on the play. But, the walking is uncalled for. Even if he did get the call correct, his mechanics looked lazy. He was not set. He was walking to his position. And, he wasn't in proper position at the moment the play occurred.

I know who the PU is and Finn would probably love to comment on this.

He has been around forever and got the call right. McClelland is still one of the better umpires in the game. I doubt he or many others care what Finnerty or anyone else on here have to say about his mechanics.

Posted

I guess at least the mask wasn't thrown at the umpire this time. He learned that much from the offseason.

Now, I suppose he went that far back to get a view of the runner, F2, and the throw. Then, decided there would be a play and decided to walk into position. Even in a 4 man, I'd be OK with him getting deep to read everything and decide where he needs to be on the play. But, the walking is uncalled for. Even if he did get the call correct, his mechanics looked lazy. He was not set. He was walking to his position. And, he wasn't in proper position at the moment the play occurred.

I know who the PU is and Finn would probably love to comment on this.

He has been around forever and got the call right. McClelland is still one of the better umpires in the game. I doubt he or many others care what Finnerty or anyone else on here have to say about his mechanics.

I'm not saying the call wasn't correct or not, but to be honest, I didnt' see anything conclusive because you can't see the tag

Posted

I thought this was an "interesting" photo.

NICE FIND !!!! But, ...where is his mitt? I'm not saying the call is right or not ....but it's still not conclusive. You need to see a 3blx view....

Posted

post-719-0-23984600-1338817668_thumb.jpg

I thought this was an "interesting" photo.

NICE FIND !!!! But, ...where is his mitt? I'm not saying the call is right or not ....but it's still not conclusive. You need to see a 3blx view....

I was thinking more like where's the umpire?

Posted

I thought this was an "interesting" photo.

NICE FIND !!!! But, ...where is his mitt? I'm not saying the call is right or not ....but it's still not conclusive. You need to see a 3blx view....

I was thinking more like where's the umpire?

OHHH GEEEZ!!!!! :D

Posted

post-719-0-23984600-1338817668_thumb.jpg

I thought this was an "interesting" photo.

NICE FIND !!!! But, ...where is his mitt? I'm not saying the call is right or not ....but it's still not conclusive. You need to see a 3blx view....

I was thinking more like where's the umpire?

Who needs an Umpire!! Don't they have instant replay? :fuel:

  • Like 1
Posted

Does anybody notice that the ball is in his hand, not his glove?

I did but I wasn't sure if he did that during the play or immediately after the tag. Also, I wasn't sure if he had it in his hand while in the glove or if he touched the runner at all with the ball in his hand. Nothing conclusive about these angles to say the call was right or not. But, aside from if he got it right or not, everything looked bad due to the walking and still moving while the play was occurring.
Posted

I watched this game live and while the announcers were very milk toast, I remember they even after watching in in HD Slo-mo they half way gave credit to McClelland by saying after looking at it in HD Slo Mo they couldn't say for sure if McClelland missed the call.

×
×
  • Create New...