Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4720 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

The auction ended on October 7. In the question on October 4 it was clearly stated that it was a Wilson mask with Nike pads. At that time the current bid was at $100. After that the guys bidding on it clearly knew what they were getting and chose to pay $355 for it. He wasn't exactly truthful when the auction started. But the bidders obviously knew what they were bidding on and thought it was a fair price.

Without researching it myself, I wonder if the bidders even read the updated information. Most likely, they bid on it once, then kept bidding when their watchlist told them they weren't the high bidder.

I agree. There is no way they read the question. But when you bid so much money they need to be more aware what they are bidding on. Don't feel sorry for the winner.

Posted

Without researching it myself, I wonder if the bidders even read the updated information. Most likely, they bid on it once, then kept bidding when their watchlist told them they weren't the high bidder.

I checked out the bid history. The two guys who were bidding on it at the end placed their first bid on the last day. The question was there on October 4 and they didn't bid until October 7.

Posted

The auction ended on October 7. In the question on October 4 it was clearly stated that it was a Wilson mask with Nike pads. At that time the current bid was at $100. After that the guys bidding on it clearly knew what they were getting and chose to pay $355 for it. He wasn't exactly truthful when the auction started. But the bidders obviously knew what they were bidding on and thought it was a fair price.

Without researching it myself, I wonder if the bidders even read the updated information. Most likely, they bid on it once, then kept bidding when their watchlist told them they weren't the high bidder.

EXACTLY!

But to an argumentative guy, the bidders "clearly knew." With such myopia, how does he even umpire?

Posted

He even charged them twice as much as it's worth to ship the fake.
The shipping charge was $19.99. To ship the mask via UPS from Rhode Island to California costs over $15. Then you have to add in the price of a box, the price of the gas he needs to drive to the UPS store. The winner could live closer to the seller so the shipping charges could be a little less but that's how a fixed shipping cost works.

I shipped a titanium mask to Wilson. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $10.95

I shipped a standard Wilson mask to another umpire. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped another titanium to me. The cost: $10.95

An ebay seller shipped a standard Wilson mask to me. The cost: $10.95

Ump-attire shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $8.95

It does not matter where the shipping locations are, or how heavy the item is; the price is the same.

Related costs: None ... no driving expenses (they pick it up at your house); no box charge (the box is supplied, and is also dropped off at your house).

THAT'S how a fixed shipping cost works for those of us who know this subject. Now, go argue some other point.

Posted

I shipped a titanium mask to Wilson. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $10.95

I shipped a standard Wilson mask to another umpire. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped another titanium to me. The cost: $10.95

An ebay seller shipped a standard Wilson mask to me. The cost: $10.95

Ump-attire shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $8.95

It does not matter where the shipping locations are, or how heavy the item is; the price is the same.

Related costs: None ... no driving expenses (they pick it up at your house); no box charge (the box is supplied, and is also dropped off at your house).

THAT'S how a fixed shipping cost works for those of us who know this subject. Now, go argue some other point.

Kevin, we get it. But, did any of those masks have Nike pads??? Didn't think so...

So this is totally different.

Posted

I shipped a titanium mask to Wilson. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $10.95

I shipped a standard Wilson mask to another umpire. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped another titanium to me. The cost: $10.95

An ebay seller shipped a standard Wilson mask to me. The cost: $10.95

Ump-attire shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $8.95

It does not matter where the shipping locations are, or how heavy the item is; the price is the same.

Related costs: None ... no driving expenses (they pick it up at your house); no box charge (the box is supplied, and is also dropped off at your house).

THAT'S how a fixed shipping cost works for those of us who know this subject. Now, go argue some other point.

Kevin, we get it. But, did any of those masks have Nike pads??? Didn't think so...

So this is totally different.

Unless you're joking around .....

Posted

I shipped a titanium mask to Wilson. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $10.95

I shipped a standard Wilson mask to another umpire. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped another titanium to me. The cost: $10.95

An ebay seller shipped a standard Wilson mask to me. The cost: $10.95

Ump-attire shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $8.95

It does not matter where the shipping locations are, or how heavy the item is; the price is the same.

Related costs: None ... no driving expenses (they pick it up at your house); no box charge (the box is supplied, and is also dropped off at your house).

THAT'S how a fixed shipping cost works for those of us who know this subject. Now, go argue some other point.

You are talking about a USPS flat rate box. If you were paying attention I was talking about UPS. The prices are different. You may understand how shipping works but you don't understand that there is more than one way to ship something.

Also Ump-Attire is a business. They most likely receive a discount as they ship many packages every day. What they pay for shipping has nothing to do with what a normal guy on ebay pays.

Posted

I shipped a titanium mask to Wilson. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $10.95

I shipped a standard Wilson mask to another umpire. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped another titanium to me. The cost: $10.95

An ebay seller shipped a standard Wilson mask to me. The cost: $10.95

Ump-attire shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $8.95

It does not matter where the shipping locations are, or how heavy the item is; the price is the same.

Related costs: None ... no driving expenses (they pick it up at your house); no box charge (the box is supplied, and is also dropped off at your house).

THAT'S how a fixed shipping cost works for those of us who know this subject. Now, go argue some other point.

You are talking about a USPS flat rate box. If you were paying attention I was talking about UPS. The prices are different. You may understand how shipping works but you don't understand that there is more than one way to ship something.

Also Ump-Attire is a business. They most likely receive a discount as they ship many packages every day. What they pay for shipping has nothing to do with what a normal guy on ebay pays.

I was paying attention, which is obviously a problem of yours that you're projecting on me.

Youth can be a blessing or a curse. With you, it often acts as a curse. Maybe when you mature, you'll be more aware, and decidedly more respectful.

Posted

I shipped a titanium mask to Wilson. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $10.95

I shipped a standard Wilson mask to another umpire. The cost: $10.95

Wilson shipped another titanium to me. The cost: $10.95

An ebay seller shipped a standard Wilson mask to me. The cost: $10.95

Ump-attire shipped a titanium mask to me. The cost: $8.95

It does not matter where the shipping locations are, or how heavy the item is; the price is the same.

Related costs: None ... no driving expenses (they pick it up at your house); no box charge (the box is supplied, and is also dropped off at your house).

THAT'S how a fixed shipping cost works for those of us who know this subject. Now, go argue some other point.

Kevin, we get it. But, did any of those masks have Nike pads??? Didn't think so...

So this is totally different.

Nice! That's funny!!!

Posted

I was paying attention, which is obviously a problem of yours that you're projecting on me.

Youth can be a blessing or a curse. With you, it often acts as a curse. Maybe when you mature, you'll be more aware, and decidedly more respectful.

Of course, you were paying attention, you could never do anything wrong. It is correct to quote USPS shipping policies to prove that I was wrong when talking about UPS.

You just posted a guys' real name online in an attempt to make him look bad. A mature person would have realized when you play F-F you are actually just making yourself look bad.

Posted

You are a very self-involved person.

I made the illustration to show that the guy charged twice as much to ship a titanium mask than it was worth, not to prove you wrong. You did that yourself.

And the guy's a shameless rip-off using a public domain to do his thievery and exploitation of others. He's fair game.

Posted

You are a very self-involved person.

I made the illustration to show that the guy charged twice as much to ship a titanium mask than it was worth, not to prove you wrong. You did that yourself.

And the guy's a shameless rip-off using a public domain to do his thievery and exploitation of others. He's fair game.

You are absolutely right! This sellers needs to be exposed.

I wonder if cactus is the seller by the way he is acting. Or maybe he knows him.

Posted

Sorry Kevin, but you are incorrect on this one.

First, the seller didn't "charge" anyone anything. Two guys duked it out in an auction and it drove the price way over "market" -this is ebay, it happens. YES-his title mislead. BUT-in the description it said it was a Wilson frame and also there was the Q&A portion if someone wanted to be double sure. Not to mention that it did not look like a Nike frame to the trained eye.

Obviously the title was crafted to lead "those interested in a Nike mask" to a similar offering and then disclosed in the description what it actually was. Maybe two guys thought it was as close as they would ever get to owning a NIke mask OR it was close enough for them since authentic Nike masks can go for well over $500, more than they could afford.

I know this part of the forum is specific to gear, and you are a self-proclaimed gear junkie, but I doubt that makes it your job to "take care of him" based on the items he sells on ebay, its not like he advertised it on this site.

I get that it p*sses you off to no end- not just this auction but he whole concept of Nike masks and their scarcity and that you disapprove of many reasons people have for wanting one (jock sniffing, throwing money away, etc)-it irks you, we all get it, but for goodness sake let it go man.

In the end this was an auction you had NOTHING to do with, you didn't bid, you weren't even interested in the product, so why not just let it go? Its not your responsibility to look after the "poor sap" who bought it.

/rant off/

Posted

And the guy's a shameless rip-off using a public domain to do his thievery and exploitation of others. He's fair game.

Who exactly did he exploit? He had a product, put it up for auction, and let the bidders decide what a fair price would be. You just seem to be mad that Nike pads increase the value of the mask by around $200.

Posted

He should have changed the title of his ad once it was confirmed that the frame was not a Nike. True, the small print, if read, pointed that out, but leaving the ad as it was was deceptive.

He could have stopped the auction at any point, but chose not to.

If I place an ad for an orginal work of Rembrandt Harmenszoon van Rijn, and then later get schooled that my painting was actually scribble by Larry Rembrandt of Flatbush, but leave my orginal title up, would that not be a bit unfair?

That wasn't a Nike mask, and no one in the right mind would knowingly part with that amount of dough for a Wilson frame with Nike pads. Of course................

Posted

For the record, I agree with 2ballsout and Cactus, and I had nothing to do with the auction. No one was forced to bid on the mask and thus no one was forced to pay $19.99 for shipping.

I got duped on eBay a while back by an umpire who is still in MiLB and worked call-up games this year. Sold me two pair of used polywools that were junk. They were unraveled at the hem, had stains on them, and were ready to be thrown in the trash. It was my own fault for not sending them back the day I got them.

Posted

I know this part of the forum is specific to gear, and you are a self-proclaimed gear junkie, but I doubt that makes it your job to "take care of him" based on the items he sells on ebay, its not like he advertised it on this site.

How about helping others to NOT get screwed? Did you ever look at that angle? Maybe THAT is what KFinn is trying to do here? That's how I read it...

I get that it p*sses you off to no end- not just this auction but he whole concept of Nike masks and their scarcity and that you disapprove of many reasons people have for wanting one (jock sniffing, throwing money away, etc)-it irks you, we all get it, but for goodness sake let it go man.

Uhmmm, ....no, ....he's never said that ....that's Kyle who feels that way. Kevin just thinks it's crazy that something with the "swoosh" makes people empty their wallets.

In the end this was an auction you had NOTHING to do with, you didn't bid, you weren't even interested in the product, so why not just let it go? Its not your responsibility to look after the "poor sap" who bought it.

/rant off/

Again, .... if you haven't noticed around here, ....it's all about the brotherhood. So, this auction had something to do with ALL OF US ....again, ....try to look at it as if Kevin is trying to help us from NOT getting screwed?

Sometimes, there are different ways to view things......

Posted

For the record, I agree with 2ballsout and Cactus, and I had nothing to do with the auction. No one was forced to bid on the mask and thus no one was forced to pay $19.99 for shipping.

I got duped on eBay a while back by an umpire who is still in MiLB and worked call-up games this year. Sold me two pair of used polywools that were junk. They were unraveled at the hem, had stains on them, and were ready to be thrown in the trash. It was my own fault for not sending them back the day I got them.

I think this is totally different situation. At least you did get Polywools.

The buyer of the "Nike" mask is not getting a "Nike"

Posted

I know this part of the forum is specific to gear, and you are a self-proclaimed gear junkie, but I doubt that makes it your job to "take care of him" based on the items he sells on ebay, its not like he advertised it on this site.

How about helping others to NOT get screwed? Did you ever look at that angle? Maybe THAT is what KFinn is trying to do here? That's how I read it...

I get that it p*sses you off to no end- not just this auction but he whole concept of Nike masks and their scarcity and that you disapprove of many reasons people have for wanting one (jock sniffing, throwing money away, etc)-it irks you, we all get it, but for goodness sake let it go man.

Uhmmm, ....no, ....he's never said that ....that's Kyle who feels that way. Kevin just thinks it's crazy that something with the "swoosh" makes people empty their wallets.

In the end this was an auction you had NOTHING to do with, you didn't bid, you weren't even interested in the product, so why not just let it go? Its not your responsibility to look after the "poor sap" who bought it.

/rant off/

Again, .... if you haven't noticed around here, ....it's all about the brotherhood. So, this auction had something to do with ALL OF US ....again, ....try to look at it as if Kevin is trying to help us from NOT getting screwed?

Sometimes, there are different ways to view things......

Well said Jeff!!! :notworthy:

We need to look out for each other. I don't feel sorry for the buyer as he should have been more careful. But the seller is still a Moronic Thief!!!!

Posted

Well said Jeff!!! :notworthy:

We need to look out for each other. I don't feel sorry for the buyer as he should have been more careful. But the seller is still a Moronic Thief!!!!

Thanks Rolando!!

The seller and the buyer are both douchebags! :jerkit:

Posted

For the record, I agree with 2ballsout and Cactus, and I had nothing to do with the auction. No one was forced to bid on the mask and thus no one was forced to pay $19.99 for shipping.

I got duped on eBay a while back by an umpire who is still in MiLB and worked call-up games this year. Sold me two pair of used polywools that were junk. They were unraveled at the hem, had stains on them, and were ready to be thrown in the trash. It was my own fault for not sending them back the day I got them.

I think this is totally different situation. At least you did get Polywools.

The buyer of the "Nike" mask is not getting a "Nike"

Yes, I did, but my point was that it was my fault for not asking exactly what condition they were in, and not sending them back the day I got them.

I get all the "brotherhood" stuff about the mask, but it's a silly mask on eBay. Stuff goes for way more than it's worth every day on there. If you want to spend time getting worked up about it and sending messages to the seller, go for it. It is low to try and trick buyers into thinking they are getting a Nike mask, but the buyers are responsible as well. The day this thread started, I went to the eBay listing and it said it was a Wilson frame with Nike pads. Can't get much clearer than that.

Posted

Well said Jeff!!! :notworthy:

We need to look out for each other. I don't feel sorry for the buyer as he should have been more careful. But the seller is still a Moronic Thief!!!!

Thanks Rolando!!

The seller and the buyer are both douchebags! :jerkit:

Jeff,

No, the seller is a douchebag.

The buyer is an imbecile with woefully insufficient attention to detail.

There's a difference!

JM

×
×
  • Create New...