Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

"Need a new catcher coach"

  • Like 1
Posted

Eject the catcher and call the police. Okay, I'm halfway kidding about the police, but the batter has been battered. This should be a criminal act.

  • Like 1
Posted

Not applicable to this play since that throw was not an attempt to retire a runner but it did bring a question to mind but if bot conditions were met, would F2 MC override BI?

 

Posted
1 hour ago, Velho said:

Not applicable to this play since that throw was not an attempt to retire a runner but it did bring a question to mind but if bot conditions were met, would F2 MC override BI?

 

This was my thought.  MC, leave the runner on third, eject at the end of playing action, need a new catcher as you're still on defense, coach.

NFHS Softball states MC overrides obstruction . . . I don't think it is too far a walk to override interference as well (even though it is not explicitly said).

I don't think code or sport matter here.

Why would you say that is not applicable and not an attempt to retire a runner?  I mean, it is an intentional act to hit the batter, but it is being veiled as a play to retire the runner.

Posted
1 hour ago, grayhawk said:

Eject the catcher and call the police. Okay, I'm halfway kidding about the police, but the batter has been battered. This should be a criminal act.

Half of the battery battered the batter?!

Posted
2 hours ago, The Man in Blue said:

but it is being veiled as a play to retire the runner.

Not veiled well enough. There is a different angle shows definitively this throw was not to 3B. It was a solid 30 degrees off the foul line.

Posted

ejected and suspended for the season, coach ejected, maybe same. If the coach objects to either of that I look forward to the appeal and to having the video played in the hearing

Posted

Watch HPU, he calls the batter out (for INT is inferred)

Which is why this catcher has been coached to do this :(

I got asked at a d3 game once, “can you have batters INT on a pickoff throw?” And I told him “the bar is much higher than on a steal”. Otherwise any catcher can wait for a righty (to third) or lefty (to first) to step back and do what you see here in “an attempt to pickoff”

  • Like 1
Posted

Other angle 

 

  • Sad 1
Posted

I don't know the softball rule, but this was clearly intentional on the catcher's part. AT BEST she was trying to draw a batter's interference call, but I'm 95% certain that was just pure malice.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...