Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4888 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Once again, look at that lead left leg up in the air going over the plate and that right tucked in foot trying to get into the plate before the tag on the foot. They, the announcers, had just seen the slow mo replay at :32 showing the tag, but they chose to go with the shot at :43 to say it was missed, then they saw the same slow mo :32 angle again at :58 and did the mea culpa. Should have seen it at :32 the first time they were talking about it. Why did it take the exact same look the second time in slow mo to catch it. They ain't to good. Nice mea culpa though.

As a side, did the ball roll around in the glove at :43-:46 where the PU has no chance of seeing (the palm of the glove, only the backhand side) although the correct call is made tag wise. Lot of stuff going on here. What if someone had argued a bobble?? Nobody closer than 110 feet would have the slightest chance of seeing that nit.

Posted

Once again, look at that lead left leg up in the air and that right tucked in foot trying to get into the plate before the tag on the foot. They, announcers had just seen the replay at :32 showing the tag, but they chose to go with the shot at :43 to say it was missed, then they saw the :32 angle again at :58 and did the mea culpa. Should have seen it at :32.

As a side, did the ball roll around in the glove at :43-:45 where the PU has no chance of seeing (the palm of the glove, only the backhand side) although the correct call is made tag wise. Lot of stuff going on here.

that's why it's cool :D


×
×
  • Create New...