dumbdumb Posted July 5 Report Posted July 5 https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/mlb/2026/07/05/cb-bucknor-laz-diaz-retire-mlb-umpires-buyout-2026-season/90814368007/ in more recent times the fewest amount of call up games before being hired full time was Dan Bellino, who had 1 game in 2008, 31 games in 2009, and 112 games in 2010, or 144 call up games before a 2011 full time hire. Quote
Marcus6 Posted Monday at 06:16 AM Report Posted Monday at 06:16 AM This will be interesting - would have to think Brock Ballew, Derek Thomas are in line. Also seems like Willie Traynor is a fast track and would crack this new hire group. Bacon has been up and down for a while but hasn’t been as up this year as he was last year. I felt like the hirings of guys like Mackay, Clemons, and Walsh lately were “out of left field” so who knows? Feel like James Jean and Dexter Kelley haven’t been up in a while. Also don’t think they can pass up Pawol with how much they have invested in her. Quote
GerryB Posted Monday at 03:23 PM Report Posted Monday at 03:23 PM I see there are about 14 call ups on the wiki list (with numbers < 100). Are there more, and do any have numbers >= 100? Obviously number is not a predictor, but I find it hard to think that MLB would assign a low number then release them. Ballou, Thomas and Traynor have low numbers. Quote
wolfe_man Posted Monday at 06:39 PM Report Posted Monday at 06:39 PM Just please only promote those worthy of true MLB umpire material. It should be based scores and game-keeping ability, not anything else. I don't want to bring politics in here, but let it be merit-based... please. 3 1 Quote
JonnyCat Posted Monday at 11:43 PM Report Posted Monday at 11:43 PM 5 hours ago, wolfe_man said: Just please only promote those worthy of true MLB umpire material. It should be based scores and game-keeping ability, not anything else. I don't want to bring politics in here, but let it be merit-based... please. If I was a betting man, I would bet the farm that Pawol will be one of the 7 hired. Quote
dumbdumb Posted yesterday at 12:53 AM Author Report Posted yesterday at 12:53 AM 55 minutes ago, JonnyCat said: If I was a betting man, I would bet the farm that Pawol will be one of the 7 hired. and if the exact same situation of 7 openings had happened in the past, i would think a lot of people would bet the farm that Gerry Crawford would be one of the seven hired, Brian Gorman would be one of the seven hired, Paul Runge would be one of the 7 hired, Brian Runge would be one of the 7 hired, Hunter Wendelstedt, Jr. would be one of the 7 hired, Mark Hirschbeck would be one of the 7 hired, and Bill Welke would be one of the 7 hired. Quote
Marcus6 Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM Report Posted yesterday at 01:13 AM 9 hours ago, GerryB said: I see there are about 14 call ups on the wiki list (with numbers < 100). Are there more, and do any have numbers >= 100? Obviously number is not a predictor, but I find it hard to think that MLB would assign a low number then release them. Ballou, Thomas and Traynor have low numbers. Where is this list? Quote
JonnyCat Posted 13 hours ago Report Posted 13 hours ago 13 hours ago, dumbdumb said: and if the exact same situation of 7 openings had happened in the past, i would think a lot of people would bet the farm that Gerry Crawford would be one of the seven hired, Brian Gorman would be one of the seven hired, Paul Runge would be one of the 7 hired, Brian Runge would be one of the 7 hired, Hunter Wendelstedt, Jr. would be one of the 7 hired, Mark Hirschbeck would be one of the 7 hired, and Bill Welke would be one of the 7 hired. I don't understand what you're talking about here. Could you eleborate? Quote
MAUmpire Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago 1 hour ago, JonnyCat said: I don't understand what you're talking about here. Could you eleborate? I think the point could be made more clearly but these seem to be all guys who have fathers/brothers who broke in before they did. My guess is that @dumbdumb means that Pawol aside, there has always been a lot of lowercase-p politics involved in MLB jobs... Quote
GerryB Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 17 hours ago, Marcus6 said: Where is this list? At the bottom of the wiki umpire entry: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Umpire_(baseball) 70 John Bacon 41 Brock Ballou 65 Steven Jaschinski 61 James Jean 75 Edwin Jímenez 77 Austin Jones 39 Tyler Jones 56 Dexter Kelley 94 Jacob Metz 99 Felix Neon 30 Jonathan Parra 95 Jen Pawol 53 Derek Thomas 45 Willie Traynor stevetheump seems out of service 1 Quote
JonnyCat Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 9 hours ago, MAUmpire said: I think the point could be made more clearly but these seem to be all guys who have fathers/brothers who broke in before they did. My guess is that @dumbdumb means that Pawol aside, there has always been a lot of lowercase-p politics involved in MLB jobs... I'm not denying any of that. I'm merely stating that Pawol will almost definitely be one of the 7 new hires next year. What ever the reasoning is, or however people feel about why it will happen, is irrelevant to me. All I said that it's probably a good bet that she will be hired. However people want to interpret that is out of my hands. I never injected politics, nor did I state why I think she will be hired. I speak for myself, and until I do, people should not make assumptions about my positions. Not saying you made assumptions about me, I'm just generalizing and providing clarity. Quote
Marcus6 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 18 minutes ago, JonnyCat said: I'm not denying any of that. I'm merely stating that Pawol will almost definitely be one of the 7 new hires next year. What ever the reasoning is, or however people feel about why it will happen, is irrelevant to me. All I said that it's probably a good bet that she will be hired. However people want to interpret that is out of my hands. I never injected politics, nor did I state why I think she will be hired. I speak for myself, and until I do, people should not make assumptions about my positions. Not saying you made assumptions about me, I'm just generalizing and providing clarity. One of the interesting things is her age - she is 49 per Google. If she got hired full time she would be starting at 50. For all of us who follow this, we know that is unheard of. Some have retired in their early 50s (ie Jim Reynolds). It’s also hard to see them releasing Jen after they have “invested” so much in her story. Quote
JonnyCat Posted 57 minutes ago Report Posted 57 minutes ago 14 minutes ago, Marcus6 said: It’s also hard to see them releasing Jen after they have “invested” so much in her story. I agree. They do have a lot invested in her, mostly from a PR standpoint, IMO. Almost a no win for MLB. I think that MLB may have painted themselves in a corner. If they release her, outrage will most assuredly erupt from the media. If they hire her and she doesn't develop/perform well, then that's some backlash MLB probably doesn't want either. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.