Jump to content

Hybrid Balk?


Jimurray

Recommended Posts

I'm seeing, today, Lively, called for a balk for not declaring a windup, when he looks like a hybrid/angular pitcher who winds up from a non parallel pivot foot stance. does he really need to declare because his set foot position is similar? Don't have video so I'm just assuming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Jimurray said:

I'm seeing, today, Lively, called for a balk for not declaring a windup, when he looks like a hybrid/angular pitcher who winds up from a non parallel pivot foot stance. does he really need to declare because his set foot position is similar? Don't have video so I'm just assuming.

it's not similar, it's identical.  And as I understand it, yes, you must declare.  I caught that the other day also

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

MLB rules contain a rebuttal presumption that with runners on base the pitcher is in the set position. The rebuttal is that the P declares he is in the windup prior to pitching to the batter. Lively did not declare, so he was in the set position. He then failed to come to a stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, andydufresne said:

MLB rules contain a rebuttal presumption that with runners on base the pitcher is in the set position. The rebuttal is that the P declares he is in the windup prior to pitching to the batter. Lively did not declare, so he was in the set position. He then failed to come to a stop.

The rules have the presumption that a sideways pitcher with a parallel pivot foot position is in the set with runners on. My limited view of Lively had me wondering if he was not a sideways pitcher but a hybrid pitcher with a non parallel pivot angle. @Thunderheads, with a better view of the occurrence, clarified that Lively is a sideways pitcher with a parallel pivot foot position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In addition to (apparently) undeclared windup, can you come to a set before batter is aware with runners on base? I though you could only do that with no one on.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Velho said:

In addition to (apparently) undeclared windup, can you come to a set before batter is aware with runners on base? I though you could only do that with no one on.

No. I don’t think you can do it without runners on. 
You don’t have to come set with no runners 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...