Jump to content
  • 0

Interference Penalty


Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2006 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

Posted

OBR—-one out.

R2 interferes with F6 trying to catch a fair fly ball.

‘What is the penalty if, #1—ball is caught.

#2 Ball is not caught.

Is the penalty the same if runner interferes with infielder trying to catch a foul ball?

Lastly—does the same rule apply in NFHS?

  • Answers 8
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

8 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
16 minutes ago, MT73 said:

OBR—-one out.

R2 interferes with F6 trying to catch a fair fly ball.

‘What is the penalty if, #1—ball is caught.

#2 Ball is not caught.

Is the penalty the same if runner interferes with infielder trying to catch a foul ball?

Lastly—does the same rule apply in NFHS?

Situation 1: Does not matter. The play ends at the moment of INT...R2 is out. If this had been an IFF, so would BR (on the IFF.)

Situation 2: I'd pay money to see R2 interfere with F6 on a foul fly ball.

 

  • 0
Posted
7 minutes ago, Matt said:

Situation 1: Does not matter. The play ends at the moment of INT...R2 is out. If this had been an IFF, so would BR (on the IFF.)

Situation 2: I'd pay money to see R2 interfere with F6 on a foul fly ball.

 

Thanks.

‘if not an IF and not intentional do we place the batter on first base?

Also, I meant if F3 interferes with the 3rd baseman trying to catch a foul pop up.

  • 0
Posted
2 minutes ago, MT73 said:

Thanks.

‘if not an IF and not intentional do we place the batter on first base?

Also, I meant if F3 interferes with the 3rd baseman trying to catch a foul pop up.

Yes. It's no different than R2 interfering with a ground ball.

On a foul fly, the runner is out and the batter resumes the PA with an additional strike (unless there were two to start, then it's still two, as the ball was foul.)

  • 0
Posted

The following is from the 2018 MiLBUM (p. 86)--

Runner Interferes on an Infield Fly Rule 6.01(a)(10)

Note 1: …Understand, when a runner interferes with a fielder on a fly ball (infield fly or not), the umpire must wait until the fair/foul status is determined before calling “time.”

Note 2: If runner interference is called on a fly ball and it is not an infield fly situation, the ball remains alive until it is determined whether the ball is fair or foul. If fair, the runner who interfered is declared out and the batter is awarded first base even if the ball is caught (unless determined that the interference was intentional for the purpose of breaking up a double play). If foul, even if caught, the runner is out, the batter returns to bat (unless determined that the interference was intentional for the purpose of breaking up a double play) and the pitch counts.

  • 0
Posted
17 minutes ago, maven said:

Yes. All codes agree on all of this.

In FED, you CAN get two outs on the fair fly, if the contact happened far enough from the base that it's likely that the fielder could catch the ball and then get the runner out on appeal.

  • 0
Posted
3 hours ago, Senor Azul said:

The following is from the 2018 MiLBUM (p. 86)--

Runner Interferes on an Infield Fly Rule 6.01(a)(10)

Note 1: …Understand, when a runner interferes with a fielder on a fly ball (infield fly or not), the umpire must wait until the fair/foul status is determined before calling “time.”

Note 2: If runner interference is called on a fly ball and it is not an infield fly situation, the ball remains alive until it is determined whether the ball is fair or foul. If fair, the runner who interfered is declared out and the batter is awarded first base even if the ball is caught (unless determined that the interference was intentional for the purpose of breaking up a double play). If foul, even if caught, the runner is out, the batter returns to bat (unless determined that the interference was intentional for the purpose of breaking up a double play) and the pitch counts.

Thanks.

I knew about the infield fly rule ( both batter and runner are out if fair} but did not notice the follow up notes in MLBUM

Thanks to all.


×
×
  • Create New...