- 0
Batter-Runner Interference on Bunt or Hit Close to Home?
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2036 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question
Rock Bottom
I searched this but couldn't find it, although I'm guessing it's been asked and answered before so my apologies.
NFHS rules. Right-handed batter bunts or takes a full swing, but the net result is the same, a ball a short distance away from home plate. The catcher quickly moves out from behind the plate to field the ball, bat at the same time the B-R takes off for first and runs into the catcher. Is this a no-call - play on? Or is it interference on the batter? (Of the 3 choices I'm 99.99% sure it is NOT obstruction on the catcher.) Thanks!
Top Posters For This Question
1
1
1
1
Popular Days
May 19
4
Oct 16
1
Top Posters For This Question
maven 1 post
Senor Azul 1 post
Mudisfun 1 post
Rock Bottom 1 post
Popular Days
May 19 2019
4 posts
Oct 16 2020
1 post
Popular Posts
maven
Please do not explain tangle/untangle in terms of "just doing what they're supposed to do." That is NOT the basis for the ruling. Using it as such invites mistakenly applying it to other runners at ot
Mudisfun
Sounds like tangle/untangle. Was the runner doing what was expected; running to first? Was the catcher doing what was expected as well? Straight out of the gate, just coming out of the box, most likel
Senor Azul
While it is true that both NCAA and OBR address this question in an actual rule [NCAA rule 7-11f Exception 4; OBR rule 6.01(a)(10) Comment], I don’t think the FED does. At least the 2016 BRD couldn’t
4 answers to this question
Recommended Posts