Jump to content
  • 0

OBS called on fielder in possession of the ball


Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3390 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

Posted

Happened in a game I was watching.

R1 with two out, ground ball hit to F4 - ball is fielded about 20 feet to the right of 2B, right on the path between first and second - runner is less than ten feet from F4.   This is 12/13 yo level.

F4 turns away from the runner, because that's what they do at that age. :)  And runs to second base to touch the bag.   So for that 20 feet you have F4 running to second not even looking at the runner, and R1 following by about three feet - R1 is faster than F4 and slows up rather than try to go around F4, avoid the tag and get to the base.

Ump calls OBS.

Coach argues that F4 had the ball, simply chose to tag the base rather than the runner.  Umpire called it "a classic case of obstruction".

Who's right?

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted
8 minutes ago, beerguy55 said:

Happened in a game I was watching.

R1 with two out, ground ball hit to F4 - ball is fielded about 20 feet to the right of 2B, right on the path between first and second - runner is less than ten feet from F4.   This is 12/13 yo level.

F4 turns away from the runner, because that's what they do at that age. :)  And runs to second base to touch the bag.   So for that 20 feet you have F4 running to second not even looking at the runner, and R1 following by about three feet - R1 is faster than F4 and slows up rather than try to go around F4, avoid the tag and get to the base.

Ump calls OBS.

Coach argues that F4 had the ball, simply chose to tag the base rather than the runner.  Umpire called it "a classic case of obstruction".

Who's right?

The coach is. 

By the letter of the rule, a player in possession of the ball can never be guilty of obstruction. By interpretation, a player with the ball can be guilty of it if they do something intentional and unrelated to making a play on a runner (tripping, for example.)

  • 0
Guest NJ Coach
Posted

admittedly, i am not an umpire or a rules guru...but that seems like a ridiculous call..what's next...a fielder with the ball chases a runner back to a base gets called for obs too ?

  • 0
Posted
3 hours ago, noumpere said:

It's a classic all right.

haha - I promise you, he said those exact words.  Imagine Strother Martin in Cool Hand Luke..."what we have here is a...classic case of obstruction" - that was this guy.

Even the two base coaches were shaking their heads, couldn't believe the gift they just received.


×
×
  • Create New...