Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3486 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

When the NFL's newly crowned MVP takes a sack that pushes his team out of FG range, and that FG would have essentially iced the Super Bowl Victory, I begin to question the "V" in his "MVP" status.

Posted
2 minutes ago, Stk004 said:

Penalties didn't help with that.

Neither did the play calling. A running play or 2 there and a FG attempt seemed to be pretty standard there.

Posted
Just now, Richvee said:

Neither did the play calling. A running play or 2 there and a FG attempt seemed to be pretty standard there.

They got back into FG range but got called back. I don't blame Ryan for that loss at all. But boy oh boy do I hate New England. I'm waiting for @ricka56 latest Brady post. 

  • Like 1
Posted
8 hours ago, Stk004 said:

They got back into FG range but got called back. I don't blame Ryan for that loss at all. But boy oh boy do I hate New England. I'm waiting for @ricka56 latest Brady post. 

Just in case he sleeps in :D

 

brady era.jpg

  • Like 3
Posted
On 2/5/2017 at 9:35 PM, VolUmp said:

When the NFL's newly crowned MVP takes a sack that pushes his team out of FG range, and that FG would have essentially iced the Super Bowl Victory, I begin to question the "V" in his "MVP" status.

That play was called by the NFL's newly crowned Assistant Coach of the Year, and newly hired 49er's head coach.

Posted

Doesn't matter. Good play call or not, a veteran QB needs to know he can't take a sack there.  Get out of the pocket and throw it away. Pure and simple.

×
×
  • Create New...