Jump to content
  • 0

Runner hit by the ball that was batted


Guest Robert J mcdonald Jr
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3328 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

unless the batted ball has passed an infielder other than the pitcher and no other fielder could have fielded it, then it is nothing.  This most often occurs when the infielders are playing in and the runner advancing from 2nd to 3rd is behind them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

unless the batted ball has passed an infielder other than the pitcher and no other fielder could have fielded it, then it is nothing.  This most often occurs when the infielders are playing in and the runner advancing from 2nd to 3rd is behind them.

In this situation, if you judge the contact intentional on the part of the runner, it's still INT

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

unless the batted ball has passed an infielder other than the pitcher and no other fielder could have fielded it, then it is nothing.  This most often occurs when the infielders are playing in and the runner advancing from 2nd to 3rd is behind them.

And, the definition of "passed" depends on the rules code.

 

In OBR, the ball must go "through or immediately by" the fielder (such that the runner would have a reasonable expectation that the fielder would glove the ball).  If it doesn't (for example, the ball passes midway between F5 and F6 and neither had a play on it), then the runner is still out when hit, even if the runner is "beyond" the fielders.

 

In FED, it just needs to go past a line between the fielders (the "string theory")

Link to comment
Share on other sites

×
×
  • Create New...