Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 5198 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 13
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Saw it when it happened and my first thought was "Welcome". My wife was upset with it. DUH!! Definitely old school---but I don't know how Hamels thought this intro was appropriate. Enjoyed the steal of home immensely. Harper gave it right back. Good OLD FASHIONED BASEBALL. Unfortunately, Hamels mouth will cost his team. The flip side of this is I have to admit I like Hamels' stones for admitting it. If you do the crime....

Posted

Nat's GM got to make a fool out of himself.

It's a joke that Zimmermann didn't get any punishment at all for what was clearly intentionally hitting Hamels.

Posted

Nat's GM got to make a fool out of himself.

It's a joke that Zimmermann didn't get any punishment at all for what was clearly intentionally hitting Hamels.

Don't worry, Hamels punishment is a joke also and he will not miss a start since there is an off-day in between his 5 day suspension which he is starting immediately.

Zimmermann would want to know how anyone knows whether it was intentional or not, as would Hamel if he had not come out and admitted it.

How can an umpire know what the pitcher is thinking? Isn't that their argument, Are you a mind reader?? when they get tossed or warned????

Posted

We all know it was intentional. I also think that it is dumb that he got suspended for saying it was on purpose.

The bean ball is as old as the game.

for what purpose? certainly not for 'no reason' ....and then admitting it .......

Posted

Who cares the reason, a bean ball is a bean ball. Any reason doesn't make it okay.

How can you suspend a guy who simply did something that's been around as long as the game?

Posted

Who cares the reason, a bean ball is a bean ball. Any reason doesn't make it okay.

That's my point ;)

How can you suspend a guy who simply did something that's been around as long as the game?

Because like a douchebag, he admitted it! What if that pitch got away from him and hit him in the head?

AND NO..........I'm NOT some huge Bryce Harper fan either ....doesnt' matter who it was

Posted

It had already been settled on the field.

To me, if you're going to punish Hamels at this point, you have to punish Zimmermann who hit him right back.

Posted

To me, if you're going to punish Hamels at this point, you have to punish Zimmermann who hit him right back.

Yep. So it's okay if they lie and say the pitch got away from him...but tell the truth and he gets suspended. Odd world we live in.

Posted

I don't give Hamels any credit for admitting he did it...to me, big deal. I give him some credit for doing it in the NL, where he knows HE will have to bat and He will have to take the retaliation, instead of one of his teammates in the AL.

It is old school...welcome to the show hyped rookie. However, I also have to give credit to Harper for how he dealt with the HBP and his comments afterwards. Also, since acting like an idiot in MiLB, he has apparently listened to someone on his team about how he should act in MLB. He has done nothing except hustle and work hard.

Posted

I don't give Hamels any credit for admitting he did it...to me, big deal. I give him some credit for doing it in the NL, where he knows HE will have to bat and He will have to take the retaliation, instead of one of his teammates in the AL.

It is old school...welcome to the show hyped rookie. However, I also have to give credit to Harper for how he dealt with the HBP and his comments afterwards. Also, since acting like an idiot in MiLB, he has apparently listened to someone on his team about how he should act in MLB. He has done nothing except hustle and work hard.

Agreed, and good point!


×
×
  • Create New...