Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/29/2026 in all areas

  1. where's all the venom that was spewed at bucknor for, missing, 6 out of 8 ABS challenges. cc miller missed every single one, 8 out of 8, on the same amount of 8 challenges or 100% misses yesterday. let's not play favorites and pick on some (like boone picking on the young guys, (call ups), to argue with) while giving others (with the possibility of receiving an upcoming 6th WS) a free pass. game has been over since 4 to 5pm. why no post here yet. https://www.foxnews.com/outkick-sports/umpire-bill-miller-goes-0-8-abs-challenges-reds-10-8-win-cubs-wrigley-field?msockid=0709b428f05f632c31e0a3ecf10a6237
    1 point
  2. Unless he yelled it right in F5's ear, this is nothing.
    1 point
  3. Of course I’m aware of the difference; I have to call games in all three codes on the same day. Am I perfect in my recall and application of these rules? No, but that’s where having robust working relationships with my colleagues is so crucial. I won’t beleaguer the details. I’m simply riffing on what @Richvee said in a satirical sense (and I can, because Rich understands my humor, blatant, sarcastic, or satiric that it may be). If NCAA ever would need to do a modification, or course-correction, or even a regression – as we seem to be discussing – it would never be to “align to NFHS”, or any of the “lesser” rulesets. Instead, NCAA would state that the modifications are “self-initiated” or “self-directed”, if anything, and would make certain that any/all terminology was dissimilar-in-detail. You know the phrase “mimicry is the best / sincerest form of flattery”? Well, OBR will never mimic any other codex, and NCAA does not stoop to flattery. … certainly not to something (viewed as) beneath them.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...