The other pulled foot ....

[Thunderheads]

http://mlb.com/video...ent_id=25457243

For some reason, the UEFL says this call is correct, ....I don't see how

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=25457243&topic_id=39049312&c_id=mlb

[noumpere]

You can stop both of the slo mo replays at a spot where the ball is in the glove and the foot is on the bag so its an out and the call is correct.

[Umpire in Chief]

In real time I had an out. With replay I believe the foot was pulled. But I think from the angle he had Belt's swipe of his foot may have looked like he got it.

[Thunderheads]

You can stop both of the slo mo replays at a spot where the ball is in the glove and the foot is on the bag so its an out and the call is correct.

You were able to do that? Please tell me when, I can't do it! :shrug:

[Thunderheads]

In real time I had an out. With replay I believe the foot was pulled. But I think from the angle he had Belt's swipe of his foot may have looked like he got it.

In real time I had a pull, big time, but I'm watching it from Detroit, so that doesn't help ;)

[JaxRolo]

I had him on the base at real time. Good call.

[Thunderheads]

I had him on the base at real time. Good call.

:jerkit:

[JaxRolo]

I had him on the base at real time. Good call.

:smachhead:

[UMP45]

Out!

[Thunderheads]

still haven't seen it .................

[Lindsay]

I originally had this as inconclusive. As the Series ended, in conjunction with our league's rule regarding inconclusive QOCs (7-1-d ), the call became correct for lack of conclusive evidence to prove otherwise.

[mstaylor]

He definitely pulled, stepped back in time, but no camera angle lets us see if he actually touched so we can only assume the call on the field was correct.

[semper_fi_72]

I have one word;

OUT