Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
20 minutes ago, johnnyg08 said:

 

Straight forward FPSR violation. Should wipe the smile off R2 as it looks like F5 was not trying for a DP but R2's violation puts the B-R out also. "This is a safety and an interference rule. Whether the defense could have completed the double play has no bearing on the applicability of this rule."

  • Like 4
Posted
13 hours ago, jimurrayalterego said:

Straight forward FPSR violation. Should wipe the smile off R2 as it looks like F5 was not trying for a DP but R2's violation puts the B-R out also. "This is a safety and an interference rule. Whether the defense could have completed the double play has no bearing on the applicability of this rule."

TT HC didn't seem to put up too much of a stink as this one was pretty obvious. Refreshing. 

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...