jimurrayalterego Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 20 minutes ago, johnnyg08 said: Straight forward FPSR violation. Should wipe the smile off R2 as it looks like F5 was not trying for a DP but R2's violation puts the B-R out also. "This is a safety and an interference rule. Whether the defense could have completed the double play has no bearing on the applicability of this rule." 4 Quote
The Man in Blue Posted April 26 Report Posted April 26 Somebody should be running some poles . . . 2 Quote
johnnyg08 Posted April 26 Author Report Posted April 26 13 hours ago, jimurrayalterego said: Straight forward FPSR violation. Should wipe the smile off R2 as it looks like F5 was not trying for a DP but R2's violation puts the B-R out also. "This is a safety and an interference rule. Whether the defense could have completed the double play has no bearing on the applicability of this rule." TT HC didn't seem to put up too much of a stink as this one was pretty obvious. Refreshing. 1 Quote
mac266 Posted April 27 Report Posted April 27 What are they arguing about? That's as FPSR as a FPSR call can be. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.