Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Over the last few years, the algorithm has decided I need a steady diet of umpire influencers.

GoPros on masks. Meta glasses (had to Google those… I am, in fact, uncool). “Day in the life” content, mic’d up clips, etc.

Is there any real value here, or mostly content for content’s sake?

Posted

I don't do social media, so my answer is going to be (a) limited to my limited experience, and (b) subject to my bias about social media.

From what I have seen people post on forums (and typically Youtube is the only thing I will click on), it is garbage content.  

I question the rationale of somebody recording other people's minor children and posting it online for their "please validate my life with clicks" content.  That also calls into question organizations that allow umpires to do this.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, BLWizzRanger said:

How about... 'how not to do it?' That has some value, don't it?

Sure, if that's how it was presented but, I'm too short on time in this world to have to process someone taking themselves way too seriously AND giving bad information to then acknowledge that's how not to do it...

~Dawg

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...