Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 5497 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I don't know. Don't know what U3 saw from his angle is all I can say. I wonder if the glove disappeared from his angle before R2's hand touched and that is what he went by. That is my only assumption.

My question is why is he in fair territory? Isn't it better to be in foul territory to have an angle on when the glove does actually touch the runner? Wasn't he shielded from that fact by being in fair territory? Without a 4 man manual, I am asking b/c I thought most take this play in foul territory but I could be wrong.

Posted

I don't know. Don't know what U3 saw from his angle is all I can say. I wonder if the glove disappeared from his angle before R2's hand touched and that is what he went by. That is my only assumption.

My question is why is he in fair territory? Isn't it better to be in foul territory to have an angle on when the glove does actually touch the runner? Wasn't he shielded from that fact by being in fair territory? Without a 4 man manual, I am asking b/c I thought most take this play in foul territory but I could be wrong.

This was going to be my second question, but I knew you'd be the first to answer, and I knew you'd bring up positioning!! :notworthy:

Posted this 'somewhere else' also, and was told positioning was correct

Posted

Then why are these umpires in foul territory or on the line?

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=17131247

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=17363457

http://mlb.mlb.com/video/play.jsp?content_id=17505523

Posted

I don't know. Don't know what U3 saw from his angle is all I can say. I wonder if the glove disappeared from his angle before R2's hand touched and that is what he went by. That is my only assumption.

My question is why is he in fair territory? Isn't it better to be in foul territory to have an angle on when the glove does actually touch the runner? Wasn't he shielded from that fact by being in fair territory? Without a 4 man manual, I am asking b/c I thought most take this play in foul territory but I could be wrong.

This was going to be my second question, but I knew you'd be the first to answer, and I knew you'd bring up positioning!! :notworthy:

Posted this 'somewhere else' also, and was told positioning was correct

He must have been blocked out...the camera didn't give us angles from anywhere else except where the umpire wasn't.

Posted

Well, as I posted on there, I can find more with U3 in foul territory. Cuzzi was in the wrong place. He should have been in foul territory. Then, if he missed, nothing to say other than "He just missed it". But, since he was too far in fair territory, he positioned himself poorly.

Posted

Well, as I posted on there, I can find more with U3 in foul territory. Cuzzi was in the wrong place. He should have been in foul territory. Then, if he missed, nothing to say other than "He just missed it". But, since he was too far in fair territory, he positioned himself poorly.

thanks for the info, and thanks for posting over 'there' also. in an indirect way, you supported what I said, and I appreciate it. Way too much starch in the collars over there!:rolleyes:

Posted

I love how the announcers say "The umpire was in perfect position". Just more of how they don't pay attention to the game they commentate. If they did, they would know he is in the worst position. The only way to make it worse would be to be farther from the line than he already is.

Posted

Guys think of where he (u4) was at the time of pitch--he was a good 8 to 10 feet behind 3rd base--if he went into foul area he would have to look through the 3rd baseman--close call but he blew it

Posted

Guys think of where he (u4) was at the time of pitch--he was a good 8 to 10 feet behind 3rd base--if he went into foul area he would have to look through the 3rd baseman--close call but he blew it

No he wouldn't. F5 was on the HP side of 3B. He would have had a great clean look like this umpire did on a similar play except the runner was later. Also, many start exactly where U3 In the OP was except they hustle to get closer to 3B sooner and get a proper angle on the play. He didn't just miss it. He missed it b/c he didn't position himself properly for a routine play.

http://mlb.mlb.com/v...ent_id=17363457

This would be the best positioning U3 could have found.

Posted

Guys think of where he (u4) was at the time of pitch--he was a good 8 to 10 feet behind 3rd base

Doesn't change the point, but it's U3.

Posted

How, from any angle, and any speed do you have an out here ????????????

http://mlb.mlb.com/v...ent_id=17835683

It is pretty easy making calls after you watch frame by frame video replays...

I understand, .... I had it safe all day long at full speed from the replays. Not that I'm a pro, or better than anyone else...it just seemed so obvious to me. Do we all screw up? Hell yes ...me included .....but.......


×
×
  • Create New...