jimurrayalterego Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 Don't we have an obvious attempt to retire the runner in the second pick also? Quote
The Man in Blue Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 Can it be an obvious attempt if F3 is not in a position to be able to retire the runner? I've got a balk. If Altuve had continued back to the bag on the first one . . . obstruction, anybody? Quote
jimurrayalterego Posted April 17 Author Report Posted April 17 8 minutes ago, The Man in Blue said: Can it be an obvious attempt if F3 is not in a position to be able to retire the runner? I've got a balk. If Altuve had continued back to the bag on the first one . . . obstruction, anybody? You haven't seen Evan's video I guess. Back then the criteria was if there was a play on. But things could have changed. It happened again today with LAA - Yankees. It will show up in Boones ejection when CCS reports on it. 1 Quote
Velho Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 Disclosure: Biased party (Go M's) 13 hours ago, The Man in Blue said: Can it be an obvious attempt if F3 is not in a position to be able to retire the runner? The tag was closer than one would think for "not in a position to be able to retire the runner" Quote
The Man in Blue Posted April 17 Report Posted April 17 6 hours ago, Velho said: Disclosure: Biased party (Go M's) The tag was closer than one would think for "not in a position to be able to retire the runner" Fair point . . . . . . and the first car wreck I was involved in was a lady who ran a stop sign "but almost made it." That was her legal defense for clipping me. Guess who was wrong (and not "almost right")? 1 Quote
jimurrayalterego Posted 12 hours ago Author Report Posted 12 hours ago Just saw this MLB technique at 1B trickle down to FED in a playoff game. Not a balk in NFHS. Don't know about MLB or NCAA now. 1 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.