why was this not posted

[dumbdumb]

why was this not posted. it would be if it were the pro's. we need more of these type postings from all levels for everyone to learn, good or bad,  not just pick on one level or another. ps, where is the manager, i mean coach. and read the bush league comments. this is why there is a shortage of umpires everywhere. just waiting for ai to take over at all levels and just argue with a machine or clone or cyborg, whatever. and who/whom was this and the other members of the crew. they would be identified on here by name, if this was in the pro section. not fair. let everyone who umpires get there name mentioned at all levels, not just the pro's, since everyone who receives a check is a professional. how many worked conference tournament, Regional, Super and a CWS. so where is the bashing or support like we do on the pro side for our favorites or our not favorites, on situation handling. who is getting fired/sacked like in the Horizon League post on basketball, or not sacked. let's go bare down where are those comments here for this situation in case we are involved in one like this. where is the coach/leader on this, where is the school/institution itself on this (it made jomboy and youtube for all to see), where is the conference on this, where is the ncaa on this. just asking.

 

[Replacematt]

What do you think could be learned from this? What is the value of this post? 

[SeeingEyeDog]

I like Jomboy. He's entertaining. It's nice to come home from working games and relax with some laughs at Jomboy.

More from the "Nobody Asked Me File" but...Jomboy should not be used for discussions, analysis or comment on umpires. Nothing personal against Jomboy but, we must always remember that video can be edited or framed in such a way to "fit an agenda or narrative". (And that's true for any YouTube or video based platform...heck, even Wide World of Sports with Jim McKay back in the 70s! "Oh my! This terrible ski jumping crash! Vinko Bogataj goes down and goes down hard! The agony of defeat! Oh......uh....and the Team USA jumper whose name we don't know finished 38th..."

I don't want to re-litigate previous events but, recall the umpire down south last season who ended the game on the strike 3 call that was well outside the zone and many people, INCLUDING MYSELF, denigrated the umpire. Then CCS interviewed him and we found out there was way more to that situation that didn't appear in the numerous online videos. I won't agree or disagree with his decision but, when you start getting into an atmosphere where things are racially charged and things have gone beyond you're terrible, you're horrible, figure you out...well, I can understand why people make the decisions they make.

~Dawg

[dumbdumb]

21 hours ago, Replacematt said:

What do you think could be learned from this? What is the value of this post? 

what are conference rules on this.

why did the coach not handle this. is this considered taunting. is this considered a prop.

for all the verbal judo people who say that anything short of the 14 george carlin words or physical contact it is the umpires fault for not using verbal judo so no ejection has to happen in the first place.

how else could this be handled, even if an ejection still occurs. why not dismiss all them, make them go into the dressing room and have to be called out 1 by one to play if substitutions are needed.

how is this handled at other levels.

[Replacematt]

3 hours ago, dumbdumb said:

what are conference rules on this.

why did the coach not handle this. is this considered taunting. is this considered a prop.

for all the verbal judo people who say that anything short of the 14 george carlin words or physical contact it is the umpires fault for not using verbal judo so no ejection has to happen in the first place.

how else could this be handled, even if an ejection still occurs. why not dismiss all them, make them go into the dressing room and have to be called out 1 by one to play if substitutions are needed.

how is this handled at other levels.

You're not going to get that from this clip.

We don't know why the coach didn't handle it (or maybe he did, and someone had to say just one more thing.) Hell, we don't even know why the ejections were issued--it could have been for something completely different than what is being claimed here.

I don't know if you meant your "verbal judo" comment seriously. If you did, there's no such group of people that think that way. If you didn't, that's counterproductive (and maybe even intellectually dishonest) to your claimed desire to want to learn from this.

There's no provision to put players in a locker room for a specific act. You warn, eject, or do nothing official.

Because there is so little actual information here, your questions can't be answered.

 

[Velho]

1 hour ago, Replacematt said:

There's no provision to put players in a locker room for a specific act. You warn, eject, or do nothing official.

[Replacematt]

Just now, Velho said:

I should have been more clear in that this is not a situation where this is an acceptable use of a provision to do so.