Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 5949 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

High school game...Batter hits a grounder to F6 who throws to F3. Ball arrives with BR still about a step and a half away from 1B, but the throw is a bit wide and F3 has to reach in front of BR. F3 drops the ball but it bounces directly up to him before BR reaches first. During the time the ball bounced down and up to F3, the BR slows up a little but makes unintentional contact with F3. The runner is called safe due to obstruction. The contact is ignored. Is the call correct? What if F3 had dropped the ball again off the bounce due to the contact?

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Under any rules I have ever played for the above call is correct. It's just one of those unavoidable necessary evils that occur during the game. There really is no way around it!

Posted

It sounds like they called obstruction, which under Fed rules is probably correct. The caveat to Fed is did he block the whole base off. If the runner has a line to te base then it isn't obstruction. Any other code it's a trainwreck and call the play according to what happened.

Posted (edited)

I have to agree,sounds like obstruction.But did he block the runners path to the bag completely?If not then I would say you have a train wreck.

Edited by blp79

×
×
  • Create New...