Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3380 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, BrianC14 said:

Let's realize this is all supposition, because we don't know why he called a balk.  

Without getting into how I know this, he told the rules interpreter that he called the balk for not stepping towards third. That should remove all supposition! :)

  • Like 1
Posted
56 minutes ago, Matt said:

I think you're misunderstanding what we're saying. 

Agreed. Without a published explanation from the guy who called it, we can only speculate. Just throwing out alternate possibilities. Him screwing up and calling a no stop when he shouldn't have is just as plausible at this point as not stepping towards third before going to first. When I first saw the video I expected it to be a no stop until he stepped to third.

Posted
53 minutes ago, NorthTexasUmp said:

Without getting into how I know this, he told the rules interpreter that he called the balk for not stepping towards third. That should remove all supposition! :)

Okay then. 

Posted
2 hours ago, NorthTexasUmp said:

Without getting into how I know this, he told the rules interpreter that he called the balk for not stepping towards third. That should remove all supposition! :)

OK, thanks for bringing in what you knew or learned about it.  Except the video clearly shows that he did step to 3B.  

Posted
2 hours ago, Matt said:

I think you're misunderstanding what we're saying. 

Matt,

I was responding to the supposition posed that maybe U3 called it for a no-stop, and the comment included that the glove was still "moving" when F1's foot was lifted.

×
×
  • Create New...