Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 2945 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

When the Official Playing Rules Committee changed the recently-retired runner's interference rule over the offseason in response to Boston's protest of an INT no-call against Yankees baserunner Matt Holliday, we pondered how long it would take for such a quirky play to occur again. Recently...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

View the full article

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
52 minutes ago, Gil said:

When the Official Playing Rules Committee changed the recently-retired runner's interference rule over the offseason in response to Boston's protest of an INT no-call against Yankees baserunner Matt Holliday, we pondered how long it would take for such a quirky play to occur again. Recently...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

View the full article

Don't... don't listen to the color commentary. Your IQ will drop.

Posted
21 minutes ago, maven said:

What a weird title. I guess almost every double play counts as "retired runner non-interference." :rolleyes:

Before the the "bona fide" rule change Wendelstedt considered the "retired runner continuing to run the bases" as the rationale for allowing the breakup of the DP.


×
×
  • Create New...