Jump to content

Was he right

Maqiaump

By Maqiaump
in Situations

 Share
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 3649 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Maqiaump

Maqiaump

Posted
Posted

2 outs, runner on 2nd pop up to second baseman. Run on second makes contact with ss, coach on 3rd wants interference/obstruction.  Umpire tells coach since ball was caught and runner was nor played on no interference/obstruction.  Was he correct?  Thanks

  • Replies 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

umptwo
umptwo

Right result.  Simpler explanation would be that it is obstruction--and after the play the runner gets placed where the umpire thinks he would have gotten had there been no obstruction.  In this case,

umptwo

umptwo

Posted
Posted

Right result.  Simpler explanation would be that it is obstruction--and after the play the runner gets placed where the umpire thinks he would have gotten had there been no obstruction.  In this case, he gets placed in the dugout to get his glove because there are three outs.

  • Like 1
zm1283

zm1283

Posted
Posted

Probably a good idea to point to the obstruction in case the ball is not caught. 

 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...