Jump to content
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 4342 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.

Recommended Posts

Posted

MLB issued a clarification of home plate collision Rule 7.13 this week, stating that even though the letter of the law requires catchers to allow runners a lane to score (and, in turn, requires runners to avoid unnecessary contact with catchers), "common sense" shall prevail, both in real time and...

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for full links, other content, and more! ]]

View the full article

  • Replies 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

So up until now 7.13 had been treated a lot like Type A obstruction: a play is being attempted on a runner who was impeded, award the runner the base. Now the shift seems to be to apply something more like the Type B standard: the runner only gets the base if the hindrance is what otherwise causes him to be out.

 

At face value that makes a certain amount of sense. But it seems like the change in application means that if the rule is violated, then obstruction should already have been called: the runner has been hindered by a fielder not in possession of the ball or in the act of fielding the ball.


×
×
  • Create New...