Runner on third base with two outs. The hitter checks his swing and the ball glances off something and goes to the backstop. The umpire calls a past ball off the catcher’s glove so runner scores. The catcher claims the ball hit the bat instead or at least before it hit his glove but manager cannot appeal a foul tip so instead he appeals that the pitch hit the batter. After review there is unarguable video evidence that the ball did not hit the batter but did in fact hit the bat before it glanced off the side of catcher’s glove. Neither what was called on the field nor what was appealed was what actually happened. The manager did not win the appeal because the ball did not hit the batter but the umpire’s call was still wrong. Does the call remain the same or is it changed to a foul ball, which is the correct one, despite that not being something that was called or was challenged and in fact is not eligible for an appeal? If so, does the manager retain his appeal or does he lose it because what he appealed did not happen?