Jump to content

Question

Posted

Scenario: Top 2nd inning, Runners on 1st(B4) and 3rd(B1), 2 outs(B2&B3). Batter 5 count 3-2, walks on a wild pitch (pitch is a ball). While proceeding to 1st base, batter 1 on third base attempts to steal home on the wild pitch and is out at home. The out occurs before batter 5 touches 1st base. 3rd out. Head to the bottom of the 2nd. Question is: Who leads off the Top of the 3rd inning? Batter 5 (because they didn’t make it to 1st on the walk) or batter 6. Using GameChanger as my book, it tells me batter 6 is the leadoff batter. The opposing book keeper sends batter 5 to the plate. We don’t notice this and batter 5 gets on with an error to our pitcher. Batter 6 runs to the plate and as we notice this isn’t the correct batter, our frustrated pitcher delivers a pitch. No Batted out of Order can be called because of it, but I’m curious who should have led off?

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
Posted

5.04 Batting
(a) Batting Order
(1) Each player of the offensive team shall bat in the order
that his name appears in his team’s batting order.
(2) The batting order shall be followed throughout the game
unless a player is substituted for another. In that case the
substitute shall take the place of the replaced player in the
batting order.
(3) The first batter in each inning after the first inning shall
be the player whose name follows that of the last player
who legally completed his time at bat in the preceding
inning

 

and

 
24
Rule 5.04(c) Completing Time at Bat
A batter has legally completed his time at bat when he is put out
or becomes a runner
 
and
 
(b) The batter becomes a runner and is entitled to first base without
liability to be put out (provided he advances to and touches first
base) when:
(1) Four “balls” have been called by the umpire
  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
  • 0
Posted

 

11 hours ago, Coachy said:

I’m curious who should have led off?

The same would apply if it was a dropped third strike.  As soon as ball four or strike three happens - whether caught or not - he's no longer a batter.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • 0
Posted

The very / immediate / exact moment the pitch is “called” Ball 4, the Batter becomes a Runner (the Batter-Runner, or BR). Conjunctively, the Batter’s time at-bat has ended. 

Whether or not, or when BR reaches 1B is of no consequence or affect upon the pitch that changed his status from Batter to BR, and ended his time at bat; the pitch being either Ball 4 or Strike 3 (for simplicity, I’m not getting into batted balls or Batter’s Interference (BI) calls) did that. 

Thus, if this was Edwards (B5=E), then Fitzgerald (B6=F) should have been up to bat (led off) the next inning. 

GameChanger should have scored/recorded it as “BB” (Walk) and Arroyo (B1/R3) CS. GameChanger wasn’t deficient, it was the other team’s deficiency, compounded by the (your) pitcher’s frenetic pitching and play. 🤨 

Pitchers. 🙄

  • Haha 2
  • 0
Posted
On 8/11/2024 at 11:08 PM, Coachy said:

We don’t notice this and batter 5 gets on with an error to our pitcher. Batter 6 runs to the plate and as we notice this isn’t the correct batter, our frustrated pitcher delivers a pitch. No Batted out of Order can be called because of it

Your inference is incorrect. Batter 6 is (also) batting out of order, and the umpire should rectify the error (without penalty to the offense, due to the timing of the notification).

  • 0
Posted
8 minutes ago, maven said:

Your inference is incorrect. Batter 6 is (also) batting out of order, and the umpire should rectify the error (without penalty to the offense, due to the timing of the notification).

Isn't B6 now proper due to a pitch making B5's at bat legal? What's to rectify?

  • Like 2
  • 0
Posted
14 minutes ago, Jimurray said:

Isn't B6 now proper due to a pitch making B5's at bat legal? What's to rectify?

That's the way it works in LL 6.07(c).

  • Like 1
  • 0
Posted
31 minutes ago, Jimurray said:

Isn't B6 now proper due to a pitch making B5's at bat legal? What's to rectify?

Why yes, yes he is.

Boring meetings and forum sometimes don't mix....Let this be a lesson.

  • Haha 5
  • 0
Posted
4 hours ago, ousafe said:

That's the way it works in LL 6.07(c).

I was also searching the rule book for this as well. We were up by a ton, so I didn’t press the issue. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Answer this question...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...