- 0
INFIELD FLY and INTERFERENCE
Umpire-Empire locks topics which have not been active in the last year. The thread you are viewing hasn't been active in 1702 days so you will not be able to post. We do recommend you starting a new topic to find out what's new in the world of umpiring.
Question
Guest mrumpiresir
Is the batter immediately out on an infield fly, making this interference by a retired runner, or is the batter not out until the batted ball is determined to be fair?
Would you get two outs on this play or only one because of the interference?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TfF0BL2SSC8&lc=z232el0hvonbvhvl2acdp432molxflngvjmwpgax3r1w03c010c.1566059262369918
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
15
9
5
4
Popular Days
Aug 20
16
Aug 18
15
Aug 21
7
Aug 19
4
Top Posters For This Question
johnnyg08 15 posts
The Man in Blue 9 posts
BigVic69 5 posts
grayhawk 4 posts
Popular Days
Aug 20 2019
16 posts
Aug 18 2019
15 posts
Aug 21 2019
7 posts
Aug 19 2019
4 posts
Popular Posts
grayhawk
I was going to post something similar. I'm not getting two outs here. Keep in mind that when a retired runner "interferes," he must actually hinder the defense from playing on another runner. That
grayhawk
1. See the red part. It's not retired runner interference if the defense didn't have a play on another runner. 2. See the blue part. R3 never scored. When interference occurs, the ball is im
Richvee
I’m not buying into getting an out on R3. Assuming you call INT, ( which I disagree with , but is debatable) the ball is dead the moment of the INT. Therefore, there’s no way the interference
Posted Images
41 answers to this question
Recommended Posts